New
#11
I don't like to put anything below 500 into a machine, just so that it's not taxed constantly. The Extreme whatsit power calculator is a good guideline I have found.
Without fail, so called psu calculators always output a figure that's far above what an actual machine uses.
Yes, I'm guilty of having a 760 watt psu too, but that's not because I think I'll need that much juice, or because I want "headroom"... far from it... it's because the really nice psu's just don't come in wattages that are more reality based these days.
Power Consumption of Contemporary Graphics Accelerators: Spring 2010. Page 3 - X-bit labs
Very few machines use all the power they possess; in fact, I'm considering hooking up a mini-fridge and microwave to my rig!
[QUOTE=Johnathan Lyman;1394398]To be safe, I like to take the advertised wattage and multiply it by 80% (or .8)./QUOTE]
Great. The PSUs works in their better efficiency when they are (more or less) at 50% of their charges.
So, this gives a lower energy comsumption, and room for upgrades at the same time.
I just used the Antec calculator for my box. It recommended 477 Watts. I used the Kill-A-Watt device to determine the actual power consumed running IBT and furmark together (100% load on CPU and GPU). The box used between 450 to 470 Watt. Idle or under mild load it used 350. So the Antec calculator predicted my PSU wattage pretty well.