| Windows 7: 0% fragmented, for seven months |
01 Jul 2011
|
| | Win 7 Home Premium x64 379 posts A suburb of Chicago |
0% fragmented, for seven months Never thought too much about it until reading some threads here. My Disk Defrag was set to once a week which I think is default. AFAICT my disks have always been 0% fragmented.
I don't think it is defragging them to get them to 0, they are not fragmented to any degree, according to Windows.
I decided to change the schedule to once a month based on some comments that defragging too often can be bad. So after eight days I analyzed C: and it still says 0%.
The computer is 7 months old, has 70GB of data and has had a lot of things moved in and out. Shouldn't there be some fragmentation at this point?
I previoulsy used Auslogics on a different computer and understand Windows may not find as many fragments as Auslogics or others.
I just wonder if it's really possible to be 0% fragmented for so long? | My System Specs |
| System Manufacturer/Model Number HP p6608f OS Win 7 Home Premium x64 CPU Intel Core i3-540 3.07 GHz Motherboard MS-7613 (Iona-GL8E) Memory 4 GB (2 X 2) Dual-Channel PC-10600 DDR3 @ 665MHz (9-9-9-24) Graphics Card Integrated Intel H57 Sound Card Integrated Realtek ALC888S Audio Monitor(s) Displays 17" SDM-HS73 (a vestige from my old computer) Screen Resolution 1280 X 1024 Keyboard HP USB keyboard Mouse HP USB optical mouse PSU 250W Hard Drives 750GB SATA 7200 RPM Internet Speed 15Mbps/1Mbps |
01 Jul 2011
|
| | Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit 1,913 posts Illinois |
Did you run Analyze Disk?
You have to run Analyze Disk to get the new fragmentation after each defragmentation. | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number Self-built OS Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit CPU Intel Core i7-3770 Motherboard MSI Z77A-G45 Memory G.SKILL 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR3 F3-10666CL9D-8GBNT Graphics Card Sapphire ATI Radeon HD 6670 Sound Card On-Board Realtek Monitor(s) Displays Samsung SyncMaster P2370HD, Dell 1703FPT Screen Resolution 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 1024 Keyboard Logitech K270 Mouse Logitech M705 PSU SeaSonic M12II SS-500GM Case Lian Li PC-9F Cooling Zalman CNPS9900ALED Hard Drives Samsung HD103SJ Internet Speed 16 Mbps Other Info Bose Companion 2 Multimedia Speakers |
01 Jul 2011
|
| | Windows7 Pro 64bit SP-1; Windows XP Pro 32bit 6,487 posts Grafton,IL |
You need to push the ANALYZE button to get the actual fragmentation %.
I'm not sure if you did that. If you did disregard. | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number Hopalong/ Godzilla OS Windows7 Pro 64bit SP-1; Windows XP Pro 32bit CPU Intel Core i7-870 Lynnfield 2.93GHz LGA 1156 95W Quad-Core Motherboard ASUS P7P55D-E PRO Memory 8GB@1400MHz Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600 4x2GB Graphics Card ASUS ENGTX460 DirectCU/2DI/1GD5 1GB 256-bit GDDR5 Sound Card VIA Onboard Monitor(s) Displays Asus VS248H-P 24"; Samsung SyncMaster 941BW 19"ws Screen Resolution 1920x1080; 1440x900 Keyboard Logitech K-320 Mouse Kensington PSU COOLER MASTER Silent Pro RS850-AMBAJ3-US 850W Modular Case COOLER MASTER HAF 932 RC-932-KKN5-GP Black Cooling Scythe "Mugen-2 Rev.B" (2 ScytheKaze-Jyuni PWM fans) Hard Drives Samsung 830 120GB SSD
Intel 320 120GB SSD
Western Digital Caviar Black WD7501AALS 750GB 7200 RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s
Western Digital Caviar Black WD6401AALS 640GB 7200 RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s Antivirus Avast Inernet Suite Browser IE 9 ; Chrome |
01 Jul 2011
|
| | Windows 7 Ultimate X64 SP1 3,493 posts Cromer Norfolk UK |

Quote: Originally Posted by bru I don't think it is defragging them to get them to 0, they are not fragmented to any degree, according to Windows. The only way I could possibly see defragging often being bad, is if you have a SSD. The amount of disk usage used by defragging is unlikely to wear out your drive any more than normal usage.
Windows defrags in the background anyway, even when not scheduled when disk usage is idle, so that could account for some of it, maybe you are checking at the wrong times?
Also, in my opinion 3rd party defraggers do more harm than good. The Windows defragger is Prefetch and Superfetch aware, so it orders the files the way they are needed. 3rd party defraggers dont always do that, and can actually defeat the object of superfetch, as the drive spends more time fetching.
For example: When you launch an application, lets say it reads the first 10KB of notepad, then the last 5KB of Media player. (yes I know... an unlikely scenario, this is just an example) Windows defragger will put the files in that order, so they can be read quicker. A 3rd party defragger is much more likely to put all of notepad together, and all of Media Player together. This actually results in longer seek times because it has to go and find the other bits, and then go back again, even though technically the programs aren't fragmented any more. | My System Specs | | Computer type PC/Desktop System Manufacturer/Model Number Self Built OS Windows 7 Ultimate X64 SP1 CPU Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz Motherboard Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz Memory 8GB 1333Mhz DDR3 Graphics Card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 Sound Card Realtek Monitor(s) Displays Acer Al1980, Screen Resolution 1360*768 Keyboard Alba USB Mouse IT Works Wireless USB PSU 750W Cooler Master Case Cooler Master Haf X Cooling Cooler Master Hyper TX3 Hard Drives 500GB SATA WBC
1TB WD Caviar Green
80GB IDE Samsung Internet Speed 12Mb/s Down 1.2 Mb/s Up |
01 Jul 2011
|
| | Win 7 Home Premium x64 379 posts A suburb of Chicago |
The screen shot you see shows C: after being analyzed. And it says 0% fragmented. It had been eight days since defrag had automatically run so I decided to analyze C:.
I am pretty sure Disk Defragmenter has never done any defragging because the disks have always been 0% fragmented. So that leads to my question. Is it possible to have 0% fragmentation after seven months? | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number HP p6608f OS Win 7 Home Premium x64 CPU Intel Core i3-540 3.07 GHz Motherboard MS-7613 (Iona-GL8E) Memory 4 GB (2 X 2) Dual-Channel PC-10600 DDR3 @ 665MHz (9-9-9-24) Graphics Card Integrated Intel H57 Sound Card Integrated Realtek ALC888S Audio Monitor(s) Displays 17" SDM-HS73 (a vestige from my old computer) Screen Resolution 1280 X 1024 Keyboard HP USB keyboard Mouse HP USB optical mouse PSU 250W Hard Drives 750GB SATA 7200 RPM Internet Speed 15Mbps/1Mbps |
01 Jul 2011
|
| | Windows 7 Ultimate X64 SP1 3,493 posts Cromer Norfolk UK |

Quote: Originally Posted by bru I am pretty sure Disk Defragmenter has never done any defragging because the disks have always been 0% fragmented. So that leads to my question. Is it possible to have 0% fragmentation after seven months? Yes, is the short answer.
As I said, it will defrag in the background anyway when the drive isn't busy. The schedule is basically there to clean up anything it misses. Most people's machines probably never even hit a scheduled defrag, as their machine's aren't on at 3am on a wednesday.
It's unlikely for it to always be 0% when you happen to check, but certainly not impossible.
It's not unusual to see fragmentation remain low, NTFS is quite intelligent when it comes to fragmentation resistance anyway, and combined with the background defragging, it is very rare for me to see a drive get anywhere beyond 3% fragmentation, with 0% being the norm. So I would say that what you are seeing is quite normal.
How often do you check how fragmented the drive is? If the answer is not often, then I wouldn't worry. If the answer is say, every day, then I would be a little more concerned. | My System Specs | | Computer type PC/Desktop System Manufacturer/Model Number Self Built OS Windows 7 Ultimate X64 SP1 CPU Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz Motherboard Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz Memory 8GB 1333Mhz DDR3 Graphics Card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 Sound Card Realtek Monitor(s) Displays Acer Al1980, Screen Resolution 1360*768 Keyboard Alba USB Mouse IT Works Wireless USB PSU 750W Cooler Master Case Cooler Master Haf X Cooling Cooler Master Hyper TX3 Hard Drives 500GB SATA WBC
1TB WD Caviar Green
80GB IDE Samsung Internet Speed 12Mb/s Down 1.2 Mb/s Up |
01 Jul 2011
|
| | Windows 7 Pro X64 3,616 posts Space Coast of Florida |
Not a chance. Even after a clean install there will be some fragmentation. Check it from Safe Mode, see if you get the same results. | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number Dell Precision 370 OS Windows 7 Pro X64 CPU Intel Pentium 4 Dual LP 3.4Ghz Memory 4GB DDR PC2-5200 ECC Graphics Card NVIDIA Quadro FX 3400/4400 Sound Card SoundMAX Integrated Digital Audio Monitor(s) Displays HP 22" w2207 LCD Screen Resolution 1680 x 1050 Hard Drives 300GB Maxtor 6L300RD PATA
128GB Kingston SV200S3128G SSD (boot)
1.5TB Seagate ST3150041AS SATA Internet Speed Cable via Road Runner 2MB Upload, 20MB Download |
01 Jul 2011
|
| | Win 7 Home Premium x64 379 posts A suburb of Chicago |
Two different opinions, one saying normal, the other saying a problem  .
My Disk Defragmenter schedule was set to every Wednesday when the computer was on (it's now set for once a month). I didn't check it more than once or twice a week but it always said 0% fragmented, even after analyzing the disk up to eight days after it's scheduled run.
I guess I could always run Auslogics and see what it says.
edit: Could not get Disk Defragmenter to run in Safe Mode. Tried Open and also Run As Administrator. Nothing. Doing a search tells me it is apparently disabled in Safe Mode although the thread is a bit confusing. Why is Disk Defragmenter disabled by default in Safe mode in Windows 7?
Last edited by bru; 01 Jul 2011 at 09:19 PM..
| My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number HP p6608f OS Win 7 Home Premium x64 CPU Intel Core i3-540 3.07 GHz Motherboard MS-7613 (Iona-GL8E) Memory 4 GB (2 X 2) Dual-Channel PC-10600 DDR3 @ 665MHz (9-9-9-24) Graphics Card Integrated Intel H57 Sound Card Integrated Realtek ALC888S Audio Monitor(s) Displays 17" SDM-HS73 (a vestige from my old computer) Screen Resolution 1280 X 1024 Keyboard HP USB keyboard Mouse HP USB optical mouse PSU 250W Hard Drives 750GB SATA 7200 RPM Internet Speed 15Mbps/1Mbps |
01 Jul 2011
|
| | Windows 7 Ultimate x64 8,025 posts |
I honestly don't remember the last time I defragged a machine. | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number Self-Built in July 2009 OS Windows 7 Ultimate x64 CPU Intel Q9550 2.83Ghz OC'd to 3.40Ghz Motherboard Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3R rev. 1.1, F12 BIOS Memory 8GB G.Skill PI DDR2-800, 4-4-4-12 timings Graphics Card EVGA 1280MB Nvidia GeForce GTX570 Sound Card Realtek ALC899A 8 channel onboard audio Monitor(s) Displays 23" Acer x233H Screen Resolution 1920x1080 Keyboard ABS M1 Mechanical Mouse Logitech G9 Laser Mouse PSU Corsair 620HX modular Case Antec P182 Cooling stock Hard Drives Intel X25-M 80GB Gen 2 SSD
Western Digital 1TB Caviar Black, 32MB cache. WD1001FALS Internet Speed 15/2 cable modem Other Info Windows and Linux enthusiast. Logitech G35 Headset. |
01 Jul 2011
|
| | W7 Professional x64 2,336 posts Portland, OR |
Try defraggler if you are worried about it. | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number Pugh Technologies OS W7 Professional x64 CPU AMD Athlon II X3 445 Rana 3.10 GHz Motherboard MSI 870A-G54 Memory PNY XLR DDR3 1600 4x2GB Graphics Card NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 (fermi) 1GB GDDR5 Sound Card Realtek ALC892 onboard Monitor(s) Displays ASUS VE205t, Viewsonic VX2035WM Screen Resolution 1600x900, 1600x1050 Keyboard Logitec 55 Mouse Razer Deathadder PSU Antec EarthWatts EA650 650W Case ThermalTake Armor A90 Mid Tower Cooling 3x 120mm in, 1x 120mm & 200mm out, self built hydro-cooler Hard Drives 977GB Hitachi Hitachi HDS721010CLA332
244GB Western Digital WDC WD2500AAJS-65B4A0
488GB Western Digital WDC WD5000AAJS-00A8B0
488GB Western Digital WDC WD5000AAKS-00UU3A0 Internet Speed 20 Mbps D/L, 9 Mbps U/L 0% fragmented, for seven months problems? All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:33 AM. | |