| Windows 7: Did you move your Firefox cache into RAM/off your SSD? |
06 Feb 2012
|
| | XP / Win7 x64 Pro 1,838 posts |
Did you move your Firefox cache into RAM/off your SSD? I recently moved my FF cache to memory using the instructions here: SSD owners: Set Firefox to memory cache instead of disk
I did this in light of minimizing writes to the SSD in order to prolong its life. However, I'm not really convinced as to whether or not it really has an impact on the life of the drive. I believe this optimization was done several versions of Firefox ago and I'm not sure it's still relevant, considering I was reading up on a Mozilla dev/support site from a while back and they stated they were going to implement better caching into memory in future builds so that users didn't have to make this manual change to benefit from it.
My question is, have any of you moved your cache off SSD? If so, is it to RAM or another drive? I considered just moving it to another drive but am trying the move to RAM currently. I have noticed a bit of a slowdown after doing so in rendering pages (which was also mentioned might happen if you do this) but can't tell if it's just in my head or not. | My System Specs |
| OS XP / Win7 x64 Pro CPU Intel Quad-Core Q9450 @ 3.2GHz Motherboard Asus P5-E Memory 2x2GB GSkill DDR2 Graphics Card NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS (EVGA) Monitor(s) Displays Dell 2408WFP Screen Resolution 1920x1200 |
06 Feb 2012
|
| | Windows 7 SP1, Home Premium, 64-bit 7,566 posts |
I have moved my Firefox cache to a spinning drive, purely to reduce writes to the SSD.
Probably silly, pointless, and a gross over-reaction.
I don't notice any performance impact.
I wasn't aware of "memory cache". I'm still on Firefox 5.0. | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number Ignatz Special; 4 speed manual gearbox; factory air conditioning; one of one OS Windows 7 SP1, Home Premium, 64-bit CPU Intel Sandy Bridge i5-2500, not overclocked Motherboard Gigabyte H67A-UD3H-B3, full ATX Memory 4 GB Crucial DDR3-1333 Graphics Card none; graphics are integrated on CPU Sound Card onboard: Realtek ALC892; external: USB Behringer UF0-202 Monitor(s) Displays NEC 90GX2-BK 19" LCD Screen Resolution 800 x 640 Keyboard Leopold Tenkeyless with Cherry Blue switches, USB Mouse Logitech or Microsoft optical wired; either USB or PS 2 PSU Seasonic SS-560KM, modular Case Antec Solo II Cooling CPU: Scythe Big Shuriken; Case: Scythe Slipstream 800 & 500 Hard Drives System: Intel 320 Series SSD, 80 GB;
Data: Samsung Spinpoint 103SJ, 1 TB;
Backup: WD Caviar Green WD15EADS-00P8B0, 1.5TB Other Info Power consumption of this system, including monitor: 68 watts at idle; 144 watts at full load |
06 Feb 2012
|
| | Windows 7 Ultimate x64 8,025 posts |
I'm not that worried about writes to my SSD. I'm sure it will last plenty long enough with the browser cache writing to it. | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number Self-Built in July 2009 OS Windows 7 Ultimate x64 CPU Intel Q9550 2.83Ghz OC'd to 3.40Ghz Motherboard Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3R rev. 1.1, F12 BIOS Memory 8GB G.Skill PI DDR2-800, 4-4-4-12 timings Graphics Card EVGA 1280MB Nvidia GeForce GTX570 Sound Card Realtek ALC899A 8 channel onboard audio Monitor(s) Displays 23" Acer x233H Screen Resolution 1920x1080 Keyboard ABS M1 Mechanical Mouse Logitech G9 Laser Mouse PSU Corsair 620HX modular Case Antec P182 Cooling stock Hard Drives Intel X25-M 80GB Gen 2 SSD
Western Digital 1TB Caviar Black, 32MB cache. WD1001FALS Internet Speed 15/2 cable modem Other Info Windows and Linux enthusiast. Logitech G35 Headset. |
06 Feb 2012
|
| | Windows 7 64 bit SP1 1,465 posts |

Quote: Originally Posted by FliGi7 I recently moved my FF cache to memory using the instructions here: SSD owners: Set Firefox to memory cache instead of disk
I did this in light of minimizing writes to the SSD in order to prolong its life. However, I'm not really convinced as to whether or not it really has an impact on the life of the drive. I believe this optimization was done several versions of Firefox ago and I'm not sure it's still relevant, considering I was reading up on a Mozilla dev/support site from a while back and they stated they were going to implement better caching into memory in future builds so that users didn't have to make this manual change to benefit from it.
My question is, have any of you moved your cache off SSD? If so, is it to RAM or another drive? I considered just moving it to another drive but am trying the move to RAM currently. I have noticed a bit of a slowdown after doing so in rendering pages (which was also mentioned might happen if you do this) but can't tell if it's just in my head or not. I have a 3GB Friefox cache on my SSD. I also have tmp and Photoshop caches on it. At my current usage, the SSD will wear out in 13 years. I will be either dead or spoon fed in a nursing home by then.
Wear leveling in modern SSD is very good. You should not worry about wearing your SSD out with caches, etc. | My System Specs | | Computer type PC/Desktop System Manufacturer/Model Number Home built (GeneO industries)/Model 3 OS Windows 7 64 bit SP1 CPU i5 2500k @ 4.5 GHz, 1.264V 124 GFlop (IBT with AVX) Motherboard ASUS P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3 Memory 16GB (4GBx4) 1600MHz G.skill Ripjaws X 8-8-8-24 Graphics Card MSI GTX 660 Ti PE/OC, 2GB 7160 MHz DDR5 clock, 1228 Mhz Core Sound Card Onboard Realtek HD Monitor(s) Displays NEC Spectraview 2490WUXi-SV Screen Resolution 1920 x 1200 Keyboard HP Wireless Mouse HP wireless PSU Seasonic X-850 (2012 KM3 model) Case Fractal Design "Define R3" Cooling CM TPC 812 push/pull, 3 120mm, 2 TY-140 case fans Hard Drives Samsung 128GB 840 Pro SSD (System), Crucial 128GB M4 SSD, 2x WD Caviar 1TB Black internal (data), 1x WD Blue 6Gb/s 1TB Internal, 1x 2TB eSata WD20EARS Green, 2x 500GB Seagate external USB, 1x 350GB exte Internet Speed 27.8 Mb/s down, 5.6 Mb/s up Other Info USB 3.0 x4 , SATA III x4, eSATA x3, SATA II x4, USB 2.0 x8. 2 Samsung DVD R/W drives.
WEI: CPU 7.7, Memory 7.8, Graphics 7.9, Disk 7.9 |
06 Feb 2012
|
| | XP / Win7 x64 Pro 1,838 posts |
This is something I figured, but it's always good to hear positive reinforcement. | My System Specs | | OS XP / Win7 x64 Pro CPU Intel Quad-Core Q9450 @ 3.2GHz Motherboard Asus P5-E Memory 2x2GB GSkill DDR2 Graphics Card NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS (EVGA) Monitor(s) Displays Dell 2408WFP Screen Resolution 1920x1200 |
06 Feb 2012
|
| | Windows 7 64 bit SP1 1,465 posts |

Quote: Originally Posted by ignatzatsonic I have moved my Firefox cache to a spinning drive, purely to reduce writes to the SSD.
Probably silly, pointless, and a gross over-reaction.
I don't notice any performance impact.
I wasn't aware of "memory cache". I'm still on Firefox 5.0.
He is talking about RAM disk. Really it is silly, use the SSD for what it is intended - high IOPs for small random reads and writes - like the browser cache. You will have aged significantly before your SSD wears out from this, but you will have replace it before then | My System Specs | | Computer type PC/Desktop System Manufacturer/Model Number Home built (GeneO industries)/Model 3 OS Windows 7 64 bit SP1 CPU i5 2500k @ 4.5 GHz, 1.264V 124 GFlop (IBT with AVX) Motherboard ASUS P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3 Memory 16GB (4GBx4) 1600MHz G.skill Ripjaws X 8-8-8-24 Graphics Card MSI GTX 660 Ti PE/OC, 2GB 7160 MHz DDR5 clock, 1228 Mhz Core Sound Card Onboard Realtek HD Monitor(s) Displays NEC Spectraview 2490WUXi-SV Screen Resolution 1920 x 1200 Keyboard HP Wireless Mouse HP wireless PSU Seasonic X-850 (2012 KM3 model) Case Fractal Design "Define R3" Cooling CM TPC 812 push/pull, 3 120mm, 2 TY-140 case fans Hard Drives Samsung 128GB 840 Pro SSD (System), Crucial 128GB M4 SSD, 2x WD Caviar 1TB Black internal (data), 1x WD Blue 6Gb/s 1TB Internal, 1x 2TB eSata WD20EARS Green, 2x 500GB Seagate external USB, 1x 350GB exte Internet Speed 27.8 Mb/s down, 5.6 Mb/s up Other Info USB 3.0 x4 , SATA III x4, eSATA x3, SATA II x4, USB 2.0 x8. 2 Samsung DVD R/W drives.
WEI: CPU 7.7, Memory 7.8, Graphics 7.9, Disk 7.9 |
01 Sep 2012
|
| | Windows 7 Ultimate x64 499 posts |
I removed my Mozilla Firefox cache, to another partitition ( HDD )
The OS is on SSD. Should i change it back, guys ?
Does it really affect the lifetime of the SSD ? I have this SSD since last November.
Would Mozilla Firefox open faster with the cache browser on SSD ? | My System Specs | | OS Windows 7 Ultimate x64 CPU Intel7 920@2.67 Ghz Motherboard Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 Memory 8 GB DDR3 Graphics Card GTX 660 Sound Card SoundBlaster X-FI XtremeGamer Monitor(s) Displays LG 32 LK430 Screen Resolution 1920 x 1080 PSU Corsair 650 W Case Cooler Master HAF 922 Hard Drives 1 SSD OCZ Vertex 2
2 x Western Digital 6400 AAKS
1 x Western Digital 3200 AAKS |
01 Sep 2012
|
| | Windows 7 64 bit SP1 1,465 posts |
No it doesn't affect the lifetime. In fact I use both chrome and Firefox and have their caches on the SSD in addition to my Photoshop caches and scratch space and also a 640MB pagefile. I also have secure erased the SSD and reinstalled windows a dozen times. I have been running that way for a near a year and I still have 14 power on years of erase cycles left on my SSD. | My System Specs | | Computer type PC/Desktop System Manufacturer/Model Number Home built (GeneO industries)/Model 3 OS Windows 7 64 bit SP1 CPU i5 2500k @ 4.5 GHz, 1.264V 124 GFlop (IBT with AVX) Motherboard ASUS P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3 Memory 16GB (4GBx4) 1600MHz G.skill Ripjaws X 8-8-8-24 Graphics Card MSI GTX 660 Ti PE/OC, 2GB 7160 MHz DDR5 clock, 1228 Mhz Core Sound Card Onboard Realtek HD Monitor(s) Displays NEC Spectraview 2490WUXi-SV Screen Resolution 1920 x 1200 Keyboard HP Wireless Mouse HP wireless PSU Seasonic X-850 (2012 KM3 model) Case Fractal Design "Define R3" Cooling CM TPC 812 push/pull, 3 120mm, 2 TY-140 case fans Hard Drives Samsung 128GB 840 Pro SSD (System), Crucial 128GB M4 SSD, 2x WD Caviar 1TB Black internal (data), 1x WD Blue 6Gb/s 1TB Internal, 1x 2TB eSata WD20EARS Green, 2x 500GB Seagate external USB, 1x 350GB exte Internet Speed 27.8 Mb/s down, 5.6 Mb/s up Other Info USB 3.0 x4 , SATA III x4, eSATA x3, SATA II x4, USB 2.0 x8. 2 Samsung DVD R/W drives.
WEI: CPU 7.7, Memory 7.8, Graphics 7.9, Disk 7.9 |
01 Sep 2012
|
| | Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit. SP-1 8,766 posts Northern Ohio |
I don't mess with the cache on my SSD. Intel has a 5 year warranty. They or I don't care how many reads or wrights. It's fast and it works and that is why I got it. | My System Specs | | Computer type PC/Desktop System Manufacturer/Model Number Home made Desktop OS Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit. SP-1 CPU Intel i7-960-3.2 @ 4.25 Motherboard ASUS P6X58D-E Memory KINGSTON KHX2000C9, Hyper X,12 GIGS Graphics Card MSI/Nvidia/460GTX-Cyclone 1GD5/OC Monitor(s) Displays DYNEX 40 IN. Screen Resolution 1920-1080 or 1280-720 HDMI Keyboard M/S 3000 v 2.0 wireless Mouse M/S 5000 wireless PSU Corsair AX-850 Plus Gold Case Corsair 600T (Black) + side panel with 2 140 mm Noctua fans Cooling Corsair H50/2 Noctua NF-P12 (120 mm) Push/Pull- Hard Drives INTEL SSD 120GB-SER 510
Seagate 1TB SATA 600 7200 rpm Hard Drive Internet Speed 3.0 mb Antivirus Microsoft Security Eesentials Browser I.E. 10 default/Firefox Other Info LG BluRay-Read/Write
Sound system
KLipsch-THX
Asus Router RTN-12
2 Noctua 140 added on top of 600t case
Malwarebytes Anti Malware Professional
Windows 7 Firewall |
02 Sep 2012
|
| | Windows 7 Home Premium x64 SP1 32,114 posts Bay Area Peninsula |
I have everything on my SSD, I'm not worried about writes:
SSD Life Free (scroll down to free version) SSDLife download page - freeware, professional and portable version downloads.
A Guy | My System Specs | | OS Windows 7 Home Premium x64 SP1 CPU INTEL Core i5-750 Quad-Core 3.37GHz Motherboard ASUS P7P55D Memory KINGSTON 4GB (2 x 2GB) HyperX PC3-12800 DDR3 1600MHz CL8 Graphics Card MSI N240GT-MD1G/D5 GeForce GT 240 1GB 128-bit GDDR5 Monitor(s) Displays Samsung SyncMaster B2430H 24" Screen Resolution 1920 x 1080 PSU ANTEC TruePower New TP-550, 80 PLUS, 550W Case ANTEC Three Hundred Illusion Cooling COOLER MASTER Hyper 212 Plus, 4 x 120mm 1 x 140mm Noctua's Hard Drives Intel X25M Gen2 80GB, SEAGATE 500GB Barracudaź 7200.12, SATA 3 Gb/s, 7200 RPM, 16MB cache Internet Speed 20 + Mbps Antivirus Avast Browser Opera Did you move your Firefox cache into RAM/off your SSD? problems? All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:58 PM. | |