What's your memory assessment speed? [2]

DDR2 Ram was so expensive in the day, I remember paying like £90 for 2gb 800mhz a long time ago, you can buy 8gb of DDR3 1600mhz for £25 now!

xXSevenXx said:

All I can say is.

BELIEVE!!

:)

Yeah, I don't know what to say.

Guess I'll have to get some 2133MHz quad channel RAM, since your dual channel speeds are even beating my 1600MHz quad channel and my CPU "max memory bandwidth" is something like 50GB/s... By the same token, maybe I'll be able to hit 75GB/s (other than from my video card's RAM, which gets that).

Britton30 said:

ICit2lol said:

Whew just tried out my tester with the DDR2 and it only just makes just under a third of the speed of the Ivy Bridge at 6612

Different CPU and chipset too.

You gotta believe it Gary

kbrady1979 said:

DDR/DDR2 was expensive for sure! I paid $97 for a 1gb stick for my first desktop......the same price I paid for the 16gb of RAM I am currently using.

Actually KB DDR is getting quite expensive to buy again if one can find it - still have the odd fix which has it.

It's possible to capture a winsat record that shows a higher score:



~32 is the 'realistic score'

If you winsat while the system is doing some background tasks, you can sometimes get the false reading's.


Flap knows how you get such speed xXSevenXx.

Nice scores Patrick, I don't care how you did it. I think I'd take #1.

lol, cheers. I'll take first on variance at least

Hmm, you're right Patrick, here running AV scan...



It would seem that it would work the other way around though, more background processes would lower the score.