Possible new CPU for my PC.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

  1. Posts : 6,075
    Windows 7 Professional 64 bit
       #21

    pedroc1999 said:
    Ok, you are better off start saving up for haswell in june/july(rumour)
    But there again if rumours are to be believed that won't offer much of an upgrade either, I "upgraded" from a 2600K to a 3770K (I managed to sell my old mobo and CPU for pretty good money so it only cost me a total of £85) it was cheap to do, but I see no real world difference between the 2, I suspect the same can be said for Haswell, I think its designed for low power consumption and thermals mainly.

    The 2500K should be good for a couple of years yet I say.
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 1,326
    Windows 7 Ultimate x86
       #22

    Yes but if he does save up, he can upgrade to an i5 or i7 which will provide a real world diffrence as it is a diffrence of 2 generations.

    also the mobo that haswell will need will set him off for another 2 years after it is released
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 3,133
    Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit SP 1
    Thread Starter
       #23

    paulpicks21 said:
    pedroc1999 said:
    Ok, you are better off start saving up for haswell in june/july(rumour)
    But there again if rumours are to be believed that won't offer much of an upgrade either, I "upgraded" from a 2600K to a 3770K (I managed to sell my old mobo and CPU for pretty good money so it only cost me a total of £85) it was cheap to do, but I see no real world difference between the 2, I suspect the same can be said for Haswell, I think its designed for low power consumption and thermals mainly.

    The 2500K should be good for a couple of years yet I say.
    Thanks for your input.
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 6,075
    Windows 7 Professional 64 bit
       #24

    LittleJay said:
    paulpicks21 said:
    pedroc1999 said:
    Ok, you are better off start saving up for haswell in june/july(rumour)
    But there again if rumours are to be believed that won't offer much of an upgrade either, I "upgraded" from a 2600K to a 3770K (I managed to sell my old mobo and CPU for pretty good money so it only cost me a total of £85) it was cheap to do, but I see no real world difference between the 2, I suspect the same can be said for Haswell, I think its designed for low power consumption and thermals mainly.

    The 2500K should be good for a couple of years yet I say.
    Thanks for your input.
    Your Welcome Jay.
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 1,326
    Windows 7 Ultimate x86
       #25

    Your welcome aswell Jay
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 2,973
    Windows 7 Professional 64bit SP1
       #26

    You'd be doing yourself a favor by sticking with the 2500K. I have never suggested an upgrade from Sandy Bridge to Ivy Bridge......it was a waste of money in my opinion.

    As far as Haswell, I believe it is going to be another ~10% faster than Ivy Bridge with better integrated graphics and maybe slightly better power efficiency. The thing is, for 99% of people out there, it will be a very long time before they need more than a Sandy Bridge/Ivy Bridge CPU(myself included!) Those things run so well right now, upgrading just for the sake of upgrading won't provide a performance increase they can see/feel. It will also be quite a while before Intel releases anything that will smoke Sandy/Ivy Bridge. I can honestly say I will be suggesting an Ivy Bridge build for at least another year because of performance, price and stability as I just don't think Haswell will offer anything groundbreaking that people will HAVE to have.

    Kelly
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 3,133
    Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit SP 1
    Thread Starter
       #27

    Thank you for your reply Kelly. From the great feedback I've gotten here, it looks like staying with the 2500k is my best option.
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 1,326
    Windows 7 Ultimate x86
       #28

    Yes i agree kbrady. Sandy to ivy is kinda of a waste. But sandy to haswell you may see a enjoyable diffrence if ivy is 10-15% better and if haswell is the same. You may see upto 30% more performance
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 2,973
    Windows 7 Professional 64bit SP1
       #29

    pedroc1999 said:
    Yes i agree kbrady. Sandy to ivy is kinda of a waste. But sandy to haswell you may see a enjoyable diffrence if ivy is 10-15% better and if haswell is the same. You may see upto 30% more performance
    Technically true, but only if you were needing the extra performance to begin with. I am still amazed at how much it takes to bog this 3570K down, and I have a friend with a 2500K that will say the same thing.

    I will, of course, have to wait until Haswell comes out to see for sure if it is a viable upgrade path from Sandy Bridge, because I'm not sure it is currently. On average, computer components are viable and longer-lasting than just a few years ago.

    Ultimately, it is up to the user on whether or not to spend the cash upgrading.......we can just point out facts and speculate lol!
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 1,326
    Windows 7 Ultimate x86
       #30

    Every bit of what you just said is true.... Including the lol
      My Computer


 
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:50.
Find Us