
Quote: Originally Posted by
Raymond
Basically Windows 7 uses more RAM?
I checked out the usuage and its pretty high. Maybe Windows XP is good in RAM after all?
Windows 7 more efficiently makes use of RAM...that's an accurate way of stating it.
With Windows XP, the machine didn't cache things into RAM, it just left it wide open and it showed as free. And people were aware of how much free RAM they had and made efforts to try to maximize the amount of free RAM to ensure that apps ran the best they could and had the ram when they needed it.
Modern operating systems like Linux and Windows Vista/7 don't just leave RAM lying around unused. Instead, they keep as much in RAM as possible since RAM is the fastest way to get data. It's always faster to pull from RAM then your hard drive....even if you have an SSD drive.
Why have 8GB of RAM and ensure that 6GB of RAM is free? That doesn't make any sense. If you have 8GB, why not use 8GB.
And when an application needs to have RAM to run properly, Windows just writes over anything that was cached in RAM.....this isn't a performance hit to your user experience.

Quote: Originally Posted by
Raymond
The thing is Windows XP can be customized like Windows 7 and uses lesser RAM.

And Windows XP is now 8 years old, has fewer features, has less eye candy options, etc. I mean, Windows 3.1 took even less RAM then Windows XP....but people aren't still using it.
At the end of the day, RAM is plentiful and cheap. It's one thing that people generally tend to simply overbuy simply for the sake of having extra because it is cheap.