|  | | |
10 Jan 2010
|
#11 | | Windows 7 Home Premium x64, Ubuntu 10.04 x64 |

Quote: Originally Posted by dave1812 
Quote: Originally Posted by Cavsfan 
Quote: Originally Posted by dave1812 Didn't you mean it was 27% FRAGMENTED? Yes, you are right. My bad!  Have you gotten it under 11% yet? That's quite a bit of fragmentation for post-defragging, IMO.
all my windows drives show zero percent fragmentation when I test frag levels. Well, I guess there are more than one answer to this question. I have used Defraggler for a long time and prefer it.
But, after what I refer to as "wasting" about 5 hours, it went from 10% fragmented to about the same. It could not defragment C:/System Volume Information/ entirely.
I have it scheduled to run every night at 2 AM and 10% is what I first saw.
I noticed you gave a +1 to Auslogics program, so I downloaded and ran it. It said 0% fragmentation after I ran it..
But as you can see from this pic, it is not really totally defragmented.
As you can see there are immovable files that are of course fragmented and towards the end there are several "green" non-fragmented files. However, when I think of defragmented, I see all of the files together at the top with white every where else.
So, defraggler says it is still not defragmented and auslogics does...
I don't know what to make of this info. | My System Specs |
| OS Windows 7 Home Premium x64, Ubuntu 10.04 x64 CPU Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550(2.83GHz) Motherboard MSI G31M3-L V2 Memory 4MB Kingston DDR2 Graphics Card NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT 512MB PCI Express Sound Card Sound card - Integrated Monitor(s) Displays Hanns·G HG-281DPB Black 28" 3ms 1080P LCD HDMI Monitor Screen Resolution 1920 X 1200 Cooling Masscool 8W553 CPU Cooling Fan Hard Drives 1) 500GB SATA-II 7200RPM
2) Fantom GreenDrive 1TB External HD - eSATA, USB 2.0 Other Info 7 fans - 2400-2800 RPM cooling fans: (5 case fans, CPU and GPU) |
10 Jan 2010
|
#12 | | Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit Southern Ohio |
Those would be System restore Points/ Page File / Hiberfile and possibly a few TEMP files in use. they can not be defragmented while windows is running.
I do not know if that defragmenter has the ability to do offline "system" defrags or not. If so, it should be able to defragment these files before starting Windows.
If not & it bugs you, an alternative you can try (but will be more work):
Do a disk clean up
Delete hyberfile (if you do not hibernate your system)
Delete all system restore points. (may want to leave most current one up to you)
Disable pagefile.
Reboot
Defrag.
When done, Re-enable Pagefile. reboot if needed ( I would make it same min and max)
Re-enable system restore and create restore point.
Going this route will place the PAGEFILE at the end of the defragmented files when it recreated, in one piece. | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number Custom (Self Build) OS Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit CPU Intel Core i7 2700k Motherboard eVGA P67 SLI Memory 8GB Mushkin Redline Ridgebacks @1866 Graphics Card EVGA GTX570 SC Sound Card XiFi Titanium HD Monitor(s) Displays LG W2453V Screen Resolution 1920x1080 Keyboard Saitek Cyborg PSU Seasonic x750 Case Corsair 600T SE White Cooling eVGA Superclocked CPU Cooler Hard Drives Intel 320 80GB -- Intel X25-V 40GB --WD Black 1TB x2 -- WD Blue 640GB Antivirus Kaspersky Browser IE Other Info LG BD/DVD |
11 Jan 2010
|
#13 | | Windows 7 Home Premium x64, Ubuntu 10.04 x64 |

Quote: Originally Posted by Wishmaster Those would be System restore Points/ Page File / Hiberfile and possibly a few TEMP files in use. they can not be defragmented while windows is running.
I do not know if that defragmenter has the ability to do offline "system" defrags or not. If so, it should be able to defragment these files before starting Windows.
If not & it bugs you, an alternative you can try (but will be more work):
Do a disk clean up
Delete hyberfile (if you do not hibernate your system)
Delete all system restore points. (may want to leave most current one up to you)
Disable pagefile.
Reboot
Defrag.
When done, Re-enable Pagefile. reboot if needed ( I would make it same min and max)
Re-enable system restore and create restore point.
Going this route will place the PAGEFILE at the end of the defragmented files when it recreated, in one piece. Thanks for this information! I can live with it the way it is I guess. I will keep this in case I ever need to shrink the drive.
Just curious, but a while back I needed to use a restore point and there was only 2 or 3 and I expected many, many more.
Can you tell me what deletes restore points besides manually deleting them (above) and the FSUTIL command (it did on Vista, not sure about windows 7). I never seem to see more than a couple restore points, yet I have reserved enough room for plenty and when an update occurs, I see that it creates a restore point.
Thanks! | My System Specs | | OS Windows 7 Home Premium x64, Ubuntu 10.04 x64 CPU Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550(2.83GHz) Motherboard MSI G31M3-L V2 Memory 4MB Kingston DDR2 Graphics Card NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT 512MB PCI Express Sound Card Sound card - Integrated Monitor(s) Displays Hanns·G HG-281DPB Black 28" 3ms 1080P LCD HDMI Monitor Screen Resolution 1920 X 1200 Cooling Masscool 8W553 CPU Cooling Fan Hard Drives 1) 500GB SATA-II 7200RPM
2) Fantom GreenDrive 1TB External HD - eSATA, USB 2.0 Other Info 7 fans - 2400-2800 RPM cooling fans: (5 case fans, CPU and GPU) |
11 Jan 2010
|
#14 | | Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit Southern Ohio |
Manually:
Turning System restore off, or off and back on, will delete ALL restore points.
Using windows built in disk clean up, under More Options tab, & Clean up System Restore/Shadow Copies ...
Deletes all restore points except the most current one.
Automatically: It deletes the oldst on its own, when space is low (the space you allow for restore points)
It should create restore points however, everytime you install something. | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number Custom (Self Build) OS Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit CPU Intel Core i7 2700k Motherboard eVGA P67 SLI Memory 8GB Mushkin Redline Ridgebacks @1866 Graphics Card EVGA GTX570 SC Sound Card XiFi Titanium HD Monitor(s) Displays LG W2453V Screen Resolution 1920x1080 Keyboard Saitek Cyborg PSU Seasonic x750 Case Corsair 600T SE White Cooling eVGA Superclocked CPU Cooler Hard Drives Intel 320 80GB -- Intel X25-V 40GB --WD Black 1TB x2 -- WD Blue 640GB Antivirus Kaspersky Browser IE Other Info LG BD/DVD |
11 Jan 2010
|
#15 | | Windows 7 Home Premium x64, Ubuntu 10.04 x64 |

Quote: Originally Posted by Wishmaster Manually:
Turning System restore off, or off and back on, will delete ALL restore points.
Using windows built in disk clean up, under More Options tab, & Clean up System Restore/Shadow Copies ...
Deletes all restore points except the most current one.
Automatically: It deletes the oldst on its own, when space is low (the space you allow for restore points)
It should create restore points however, everytime you install something. I run CCleaner a lot, could that do it? because I haven't turned it off and
I don't use disk cleanup since I use CCleaner. I know I have enough space
allocated, but I only see a couple when I have needed them.
Thanks!
Last edited by Cavsfan; 11 Jan 2010 at 02:27 PM..
Reason: added question mark
| My System Specs | | OS Windows 7 Home Premium x64, Ubuntu 10.04 x64 CPU Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550(2.83GHz) Motherboard MSI G31M3-L V2 Memory 4MB Kingston DDR2 Graphics Card NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT 512MB PCI Express Sound Card Sound card - Integrated Monitor(s) Displays Hanns·G HG-281DPB Black 28" 3ms 1080P LCD HDMI Monitor Screen Resolution 1920 X 1200 Cooling Masscool 8W553 CPU Cooling Fan Hard Drives 1) 500GB SATA-II 7200RPM
2) Fantom GreenDrive 1TB External HD - eSATA, USB 2.0 Other Info 7 fans - 2400-2800 RPM cooling fans: (5 case fans, CPU and GPU) |
11 Jan 2010
|
#16 | | Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit Southern Ohio |
As far as I am aware, NO. im fairly certain CCleaner only deletes temp. junk, thumbnails etc ..
I could be mistaken though | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number Custom (Self Build) OS Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit CPU Intel Core i7 2700k Motherboard eVGA P67 SLI Memory 8GB Mushkin Redline Ridgebacks @1866 Graphics Card EVGA GTX570 SC Sound Card XiFi Titanium HD Monitor(s) Displays LG W2453V Screen Resolution 1920x1080 Keyboard Saitek Cyborg PSU Seasonic x750 Case Corsair 600T SE White Cooling eVGA Superclocked CPU Cooler Hard Drives Intel 320 80GB -- Intel X25-V 40GB --WD Black 1TB x2 -- WD Blue 640GB Antivirus Kaspersky Browser IE Other Info LG BD/DVD |
15 Jan 2010
|
#17 | | |
Some Ideas I've found that there are a couple of things that you can do to reduce the fragmentation of those system files that refuse to defragment:
1. Take a note from Linux. Create a partition just for the pagefile and hibernation file (if you need the hibernation file). Separating these files from the main partition keeps other files from fragmenting around them. If you have multiple physical hard drives placing those system files on a separate hard drive can possibly increase performance since the system won't have to contend with another program accessing the disk at the same time the system wants to access the pagefile. Placing the pagefile on a separate hard drive will only grant performance benefits if your system has to do a lot of caching in which case, you probably need more ram.
2. To minimize the fragmentation of the pagefile, specify a specific size and not just a min and max range. Specifying the size creates the whole file all at once so that it doesn't fragment itself as it expands and shrinks. If you specify a size make sure that it is big enough. I think most recommendations I've seen is 1.5 times the amount of ram you have. However with my 4GB of ram I rarely see my pagefile usage get much past 1GB. Also something else to note, if you are running 32-bit Windows you will only be able to use a total of about 3.5 GB whether that 3.5GB is in ram or pagefile or both. For example if you have 2GB of ram running 32-bit Windows your pagefile can't get past 1.5 GB in size because Windows can't address past that. 64bit doesn't have that limitation. | My System Specs | | OS Windows 7 Ultimate x64 CPU AMD Phenom 9600 Quad 2.3Ghz Memory 4GB Graphics Card Nvidia GeForce 8800GT 512MB Hard Drives Western Digital 3x500GB |
15 Jan 2010
|
#18 | | Windows 7 Home Premium x64, Ubuntu 10.04 x64 |

Quote: Originally Posted by ironclad I've found that there are a couple of things that you can do to reduce the fragmentation of those system files that refuse to defragment:
1. Take a note from Linux. Create a partition just for the pagefile and hibernation file (if you need the hibernation file). Separating these files from the main partition keeps other files from fragmenting around them. If you have multiple physical hard drives placing those system files on a separate hard drive can possibly increase performance since the system won't have to contend with another program accessing the disk at the same time the system wants to access the pagefile. Placing the pagefile on a separate hard drive will only grant performance benefits if your system has to do a lot of caching in which case, you probably need more ram.
2. To minimize the fragmentation of the pagefile, specify a specific size and not just a min and max range. Specifying the size creates the whole file all at once so that it doesn't fragment itself as it expands and shrinks. If you specify a size make sure that it is big enough. I think most recommendations I've seen is 1.5 times the amount of ram you have. However with my 4GB of ram I rarely see my pagefile usage get much past 1GB. Also something else to note, if you are running 32-bit Windows you will only be able to use a total of about 3.5 GB whether that 3.5GB is in ram or pagefile or both. For example if you have 2GB of ram running 32-bit Windows your pagefile can't get past 1.5 GB in size because Windows can't address past that. 64bit doesn't have that limitation. Thanks! I'll keep this in mind. I already dual boot with Ubuntu and have
used up the 4 partitions for the HD so I could only make a logical. But, I think I am fine right now.
This PC is still fast as lightening as far as I am concerned. | My System Specs | | OS Windows 7 Home Premium x64, Ubuntu 10.04 x64 CPU Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550(2.83GHz) Motherboard MSI G31M3-L V2 Memory 4MB Kingston DDR2 Graphics Card NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT 512MB PCI Express Sound Card Sound card - Integrated Monitor(s) Displays Hanns·G HG-281DPB Black 28" 3ms 1080P LCD HDMI Monitor Screen Resolution 1920 X 1200 Cooling Masscool 8W553 CPU Cooling Fan Hard Drives 1) 500GB SATA-II 7200RPM
2) Fantom GreenDrive 1TB External HD - eSATA, USB 2.0 Other Info 7 fans - 2400-2800 RPM cooling fans: (5 case fans, CPU and GPU) |
15 Jan 2010
|
#19 | | |
Being a large fan of everything open source I've turned to Ultra Defrag and I find it works better than the built in Windows 7 Defrag but I haven't tried Auslogic's yet | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number Acer Aspire 5720z OS Windows 7 CPU Intel Pentium Dual-Core Memory 2 GB Hard Drives 160 GB HD |
18 Jan 2010
|
#20 | | |
Raxco Perfect disk will give the results you're after,by far best defragger imo and i've tried them all | My System Specs | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:05 AM. | |