Windows 7: Win 7 x86 vs x64 benchmark? POST UR RESULTS!

I'm in the mood to do some OS benchmarks.

SYSTEM
ASUS A8RMX-S
AMD AHTLON 64 3800+ (2.4GHZ)
2GB DDR333 DUAL CHANNEL MODE
NVIDIA GEFORCE 9600GT 512MB
WD2500YD SATA2 250GB 7200RPM

OPERATING SYSTEMS
WINDOWS XP PRO SP3 BUILD 3264 - VISTA STYLE (X86)
WINDOWS XP PRO SP3 BUILD 5508 - 7 STYLE (X86)
WINDOWS 7 ULTIMATE - (X86)
WINDOWS 7 ULTIMATE - (X64)

BENCHMARKS
3DMark03_v360_1901
3DMark06_v120_1901
EVEREST ULTIMATE V5.30 - CACHE AND MEMORY BENCHMARK



DRIVERS
FORCEWARE 191.07 - OLD SOLID PERFORMER
FORCEWARE 196.34 - LATEST BETA

NVIDIA DRIVER SETTING (VERY IMPORTANT ON A SINGLE CORE CPU LIKE THE ONE I'M USING)
-PRE RENDERED FRAMES - 0

I'M GOING TO START INSTALLING NOW AND I'LL POST RESULTS ASAP

FOR NOW HERE ALL SOME OLD TESTS I RAN......

WINDOWS 7 Ultimate 32Bit
AMD Athlon 64 3800+
2GB DDR333 Dual Channel
Geforce 7900 GS @ 640Mhz Core, 840Mhz Memory
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3dmark score - 4305
SM 2.0 Score - 1894
SM 3.0 Score - 2357
CPU Score - 830
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WINDOWS XP PRO SP3
AMD Athlon 64 3800+
2GB DDR333 Dual Channel
Geforce 7900 GS @ 640Mhz Core, 840Mhz Memory
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3dmark score - 4578
SM 2.0 Score - 2264
SM 3.0 Score - 2228
CPU Score - 894
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WINDOWS XP PRO SP3
AMD Athlon 64 3800+
2GB DDR333 Dual Channel
Geforce 7900 GS @ 640Mhz Core, 840Mhz Memory
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3dmark score - 4673
SM 2.0 Score - 2345
SM 3.0 Score - 2271
CPU Score - 900

be interested to see the 64 bit results

i didn't update this thread since it seemed as if no one cared. I'll get right on the x64 Windows 7 ultimate 3dmark06 benchmark. Only problem is the GPU will be changed to Geforce 9600GT.

seems like a lot of things no one cares! look forward to seeing your results

You need to remember that not everyone shares the same interests ...

I'm having difficulty installing windows 7 from my flash drive on this older system. It says there's a problem with the bcd. It boots up great on my new system, how interesting... I could install off dvd but I'de rather use the usb flash.

Does the older system have the BIOS option to boot from a flash drive? A lot of "older" mainboards don't.

whats the difference using a flash drive? is it quicker or something

The bios detects the Sandisk 4GB Flash drive and i'm able to set it as a boot option. I always get this error about the bcd being corrupt or incorrect. It will boot just fine on new boards. Unusual? Anyone ever ran into this problem? Could it have to do with the command bootsect /nt60 x? Should the /nt60 be something else for an older system?

Installs much quicker since the read/ write is around 30MB/s compared to the read data rate of a DVD-ROM. Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVD has some interesting info on data speeds and they seem to be identical to that of a flash drive or a slower old hard drive. Actually some usb flash drives can read/ write at much faster speeds around 50MB/s+.