Windows 7 Forums
Welcome to Windows 7 Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find support and solutions for any problems regarding your Windows 7 PC be it Dell, HP, Acer, Asus or a custom build. We also provide an extensive Windows 7 tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks.

Windows 7: Antivirus tests need better methodology

25 Jan 2013   #1
Microsoft MVP

64-bit Windows 8.1 Enterprise
Antivirus tests need better methodology

Antivirus assessment studies may lack the right methodology to determine how effective antivirus products are, but vendors still need to take them seriously as they are key to branding.

According to Simon Piff, associate vice president of enterprise infrastructure and research at IDC Asia-Pacific, an effective antivirus is able to catch all types of malware, not just a sample of malware.

However, the test's selection process will always affect the results since it is no longer "all the malware in the universe", but a "representative sample", which is unable to fully reflect the universe of malware accurately, he explained.

Most tests too, do not have an accurate methodology in measuring the effectiveness of antiviruses, Peter Stelzhammer, vice chairman of testing firm AV-Comparatives, added. The most accurate test of antivirus efficiency is passing it through a real-life scenario with a statistically valid number of test cases, he noted.

Read more at source:
Antivirus tests need better methodology | ZDNet

My System SpecsSystem Spec

25 Jan 2013   #2

Microsoft Community Contributor Award Recipient

Win 7 Pro 64-bit

Maybe I'm missing something, but I've wondered how/why the different AV testing organizations seem to use different testing platforms to evaluate the same AV product. Virus Bulletin may do their test of "ABC" using a computer running XP/SP3 and IE7, while AV-Comparatives tests "ABC" on a Vista machine, and AV-Test uses Windows 7/SP1 with IE9 to test "ABC".

I suppose it could be argued that "ABC" should be able to detect malware equally effectively on any platform, but to me, this methodology doesn't pass the stink test. Perhaps the desire for better methodology will include some form of standardization by the various testing organizations.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
25 Jan 2013   #3

Microsoft Community Contributor Award Recipient

Windows 7 Home Premium x86 Service Pack 1 - Linux Mint Mate 14 x64

I thought standardization was one of the crucial elements for conducting any form of test or experiment?

Anyhow, we know that multiple protection strategies will be needed regardless, and we can't just rely on one particular kind of program.
My System SpecsSystem Spec

06 Feb 2013   #4

Windows 7 Pro. 64/SP-1

If a testing agency wants product AAA to float to the top they will use test that do just that. Make it float to the top.
My System SpecsSystem Spec

 Antivirus tests need better methodology

Thread Tools

Similar help and support threads for2: Antivirus tests need better methodology
Thread Forum
PC PRO antivirus tests System Security
Solved can ram be bad even though it passes all tests Performance & Maintenance
Roundup of Antivirus Tests 2010 Security News
Solved Stress Tests? Performance & Maintenance
Comodo AntiVirus or Kaspersky AntiVirus System Security
Tests show consumer antivirus programs falling behind News
Security Tests System Security

Our Sites

Site Links

About Us

Find Us

Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

Designer Media Ltd

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:19 AM.
Twitter Facebook Google+

Windows 7 Forums

Seven Forums Android App Seven Forums IOS App

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33