Windows 7 Forums


Windows 7: Microsoft Windows Server OS vs Linux/Unix

29 Mar 2010   #1

Windows 7 Home Premium 32-Bit
san diego, ca
 
 
Microsoft Windows Server OS vs Linux/Unix

This came in to thought of mine. Now i know this is probably not related about anything with Windows 7 but i just thought i might ask. What are the comparisons between the two and what are the differences? Both operating systems deal with networking and workgroups along with clients and work stations. I am a bit familiar with Windows Server 2003/2007 and how you can use operating systems like XP, Vista, and 7 to be part of the workgroup with the server that has Server 2003 (for XP) and Server 2007 (for Vista/7). If i am wrong in anyway, please do correct me. Thanks.

My System SpecsSystem Spec

29 Mar 2010   #2

windows 7 RTM x64
michigan (metro detroit area)
 
 

Well, That's a loaded question.

My short answer:
They both have merits for doing different things.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
29 Mar 2010   #3

Windows 7 Home Premium 32-Bit
san diego, ca
 
 

Quote   Quote: Originally Posted by ccatlett1984 View Post
Well, That's a loaded question.

My short answer:
They both have merits for doing different things.
What kind of different things?
My System SpecsSystem Spec
.


29 Mar 2010   #4

Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 
 

Everything depends upon what you are trying to do. For example, if you are running a network and have numerous windows boxes that require centralized logins, you will use Windows servers to run as active directory controllers and most likely will also do DHCP and DNS on your network. Lots of organizations run Microsoft Exchange Server for their email and often run Microsoft SQL Server to provide database support to applications. And in a typically Microsoft environment, it's common to use Windows servers as file and print servers as well.

For some, they might be hosting websites and so forth. For lots of these installations, it's far less costly to use Linux boxes running Apache, mysql, php, java, or tomcat. Also, it's quite common for ISP's and datacenters to run their DNS infrastructure on Linux machines. In addition, Linux boxes can make excellent FTP servers.

For me personally, it all comes down to what I need to accomplish. If it's doable with Linux..that is typically the way that I go. For me, it's easier to setup and maintain. It often runs of fewer resources and requires less disk space. In addition, people who aren't all that knowledgeable usually don't mess with Linux machines as they are often command line only and people who require a GUI are often lost...thus they don't screw anything up pointing and clicking.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Reply

 Microsoft Windows Server OS vs Linux/Unix problems?



Thread Tools



Similar help and support threads for: Microsoft Windows Server OS vs Linux/Unix
Thread Forum
Linux/UNIX Commands in Windows CLI? Software
What has Linux and UNIX to do with D-Link DNS-320 and a Windows 7 comp Network & Sharing
Linux & Unix installation! Chillout Room
Linux/Unix Print Server Network & Sharing
Windows, UNIX and Linux Data Sharing Tool Available News


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:25 AM.


Seven Forums Android App Seven Forums IOS App Follow us on Facebook

Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized,
sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation.
"Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.
© Designer Media Ltd
  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32