 | |
| |
| 28 Jul 2010 | #1 |
| | Microsoft Security Essentials Comparative Review Quote: Malware Research Group has conducted a comparative review of Microsoft Secirity Essensials. In this review we compared Microsoft Secirity Essensials to Avira’s AntiVir Personal and Avast Home Edition. The comparative had three stages: Real Time System Protection Test: 20 Zero-Day malware samples were used. Self Protection Test: MRG Self Protection Test Tool V 2.0 was used. Online Banking Security Test: MRG FM Simulator V1.0 was used. Disclaimer: This is only one small test. You should not use this information soley to determine your anti-virus of choice. |
My System Specs | |
| 28 Jul 2010 | #2 |
| | The complete lack of credit info on this company throws a bad light on their credibility. Also they tested an old version of MSE. Their results also conflict with other comparative reports. |
| My System Specs |
| 29 Jul 2010 | #3 |
| | That was the most poorly written report I have ever seen in my life. Also, see part 7 and 8 of the methodology. According to them, whether an AV manages to stop the malware or not, it passes their test with flying colors. If they can't even fix a blatantly obvious typo before publishing their results, I feel like I shouldn't even read the report (but I did anyways). |
| My System Specs |
| . |
| |
 |
Microsoft Security Essentials Comparative Review problems?
| Thread Tools | |
| Similar help and support threads for: Microsoft Security Essentials Comparative Review | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| AVG 9 Internet Security v Microsoft Security Essentials | System Security | |||
| Security Essentials 2011 / 2010 - Rogue Microsoft Security Essentials | Security News | |||
 Is Microsoft Security Essentials and Windows Firewall enough Security? | System Security | |||
| Free Microsoft Security Tool Kills Microsoft Security Essentials Alert | Security News | |||
| Microsoft Security Essentials | System Security | |||
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:40 AM.
