Most effective security suite?

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

  1. Posts : 25
    Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
       #11

    I like avast too but you do need to configure ir to suit your usage- i had to tune the web shield off as it was slowing my browsing right down.
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 451
    Windows 7 Ultimate
       #12

    I'm with Corrine...On my main Win7 rig I use Eset's NOD 32 AV 4.0...it does have Antispyware built in. I'm also running MalwareBytes (full). I also do run SUPERANTISpyware but only as an on-demand scanner. I also rely on the my Win7 Fireware along with my Hardware Firewall in my Router. I have always said, as it was taught to me when I used be be a HijackThis helper, that a layered defense was the best defense along with common sense.

    On the rest of my hardware (PC's and Laptops) I'm running NOD 32 on a couple and the rest have Avast. I have run the Comodo Firewall and Antivirus Suite in the past and found them to be quite adequate.
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 268
    windows 7 ultimate 64 bit,Windows 7 ultimate 32 bit,Windows XP sp3 home
       #13

    unifex said:
    My question is simple - which security suite is most efficient, namely consumes least resources?
    well this is a very good review....Lightest AV/IS Test

    for example ....here is a snip of boot time with various av/suites
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Most effective security suite?-av-test.jpg  
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 851
    Windows 8 Professional x64
       #14

    MSE is the best
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 622
    Arch Linux 64-bit
       #15

    You could take the test posted by thathagat as a starting point. Performance will vary depending on a few factors including the machine it is running on and the version of the product being used.

    You are best trying out products until you find one that works well for you.

    I personally find the latest Norton products to run really well on my machine.
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 851
    Windows 8 Professional x64
       #16

    but norton takes more system resources than MSE rite?
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 622
    Arch Linux 64-bit
       #17

    Norton uses far less RAM than MSE.

    However, unless you have a really old computer, that shouldn't be of concern.

    What will cause you to notice an anti-virus these days is the CPU usage and I/O reads/writes.

    For me, Norton is low on them.
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 627
    Windows 7 Pro 64 bit
       #18

    Well over the years I have tried a lot of different ones. To date I have not found anything as good as Kaspersky Internet Security and it runs great on Win7

    Internet Security Software 2010 for Home Computer Security - Kaspersky Lab United States

    I think this will be the one I will stick with from now on
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 71
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64 - Windows 7 Pro x64
       #19

    malexous said:
    Norton uses far less RAM than MSE.

    However, unless you have a really old computer, that shouldn't be of concern.

    What will cause you to notice an anti-virus these days is the CPU usage and I/O reads/writes.

    For me, Norton is low on them.
    I agree, with the latest NIS2011 beta on my PC, it is using less than 8MB of RAM!
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 2,686
    Windows 8.1 Pro w/Media Center 64bit, Windows 7 HP 64bit
       #20

    bagavan said:
    but norton takes more system resources than MSE rite?
    Check the link that Thathagat posted and look at the Memory usage test. MSE is one of the highest and Norton is near the lower end. Check out all the results. Interesting test and results.

    Jim
      My Computer


 
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:15.
Find Us