Best AV out there?

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast

  1. Posts : 19,383
    Windows 10 Pro x64 ; Xubuntu x64
       #31

    Layback Bear said:
    It's like a car that can't start pollutes the least.
    Its also a useless hunk of metal....its no use to anyone.
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 10,485
    W7 Pro SP1 64bit
       #32

    Britton30 said:
    I wonder if it's because MSE doesn't use a detection engine as robust as the others? It relies mainly on definitions, I think, while the other use heuristics and behavior for detections. Windows may object to having its innards tickled by some security suites depending on how the user configures his system.

    Norton 360 does have a lot of useless "Optimizing" tools, one of which is a built-in defragger and temp file cleaner, both rubbish.

    "Macrapee", I think, is the same as MuckAfee.
    Who says MSE doesn't have heuristics?? - Wilders Security Forums

    MSE has heuristics - they just suck.
    MSE worries
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 167
    Windows 7 x64 Home Premium SP1
       #33

    About BSODs.. I had one when I was using avast. I don't know what it was caused by, it just appeared like that. One day when I booted up my laptop I got nice little BSOD, I don't remember what it said but I only had to reboot the laptop and it was gone. I haven't had another BSOD since and it's the first BSOD I've ever had, heh. I wonder why it appeared at all, my PC is 100% healthy.
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 611
    Windows 8.1
       #34

    So all this talk of the freebies, MC'crappe or Not'on(Norton)


    Has anyone else tried Kapersky, ESET or Trend Micro?

    I've used and am using all 3 in one way or another.

    Eset is great for Gaming, as it prioritizes full screen apps and slows it self down, whilst staying upto date and running silently. My only bugbear with this, is the popups when the DB is out of date, that it then deals with itself anyway ;@

    Gamer mode is a feature in ESET Smart Security and ESET NOD32 Antivirus version 5.x and later:

    Activated by default when ESET detects any full-screen application in use (games, movies, etc.).
    Maximizes performance and minimizes intrusion when full-screen applications are running.
    Postpones scheduled tasks (for example, virus signature database updates or scheduled computer scans).
    Disables notification windows.
    Minimizes CPU usage by ESET to improve system performance.
    Kapersky i found does work quietly in the background and you hardly notice it, until it's needed. Also very sparse with the requirements on your hardware.

    Trend, well its a Server / client AV i use in businesses. But i just like the central configuration, push out ability and the automatic updating of all clients. Very few problems with this once it's setup and going. Though initial config can be troublesome.


    **Celebrate**
    400th Post
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 24,479
    Windows 7 Ultimate X64 SP1
       #35

    Congrats on the 400th Tom.

    I think every free/paid AV in the world has been discussed here at one time or other.
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 20,583
    Win-7-Pro64bit 7-H-Prem-64bit
       #36

    Yes this is always a interesting debate,
    I don't begin to understand the under the hood workings of an a-v,
    All I do know is I've lived without a re-install for nearly 3 years,
    Windows updates and built-in programs work very well, especially Internet explorer of all versions,
    Habits have not changed at all/ no question about some sites "they're Questionable"
    You rarely get what you pay for so I only pay for the ones I believe work,
    Cheers.
    I like Chevy
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 24,479
    Windows 7 Ultimate X64 SP1
       #37

    Just for fun you can try this test file with you own AV choice. A good AV will recognize it as malware of some sort. It is, in fact harmless and has been used for years in testing. I'm sure today's AVs would need a tougher test than the EICAR test.

    Download ° EICAR - European Expert Group for IT-Security
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 611
    Windows 8.1
       #38

    Britton30 said:
    Just for fun you can try this test file with you own AV choice. A good AV will recognize it as malware of some sort. It is, in fact harmless and has been used for years in testing. I'm sure today's AVs would need a tougher test than the EICAR test.

    Download ° EICAR - European Expert Group for IT-Security
    Thanks Gary,

    Must say that those files were blocked by Chrome, before they even started downloading. Who knew?
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 24,479
    Windows 7 Ultimate X64 SP1
       #39

    IE10 let them all try to start, Norton did not block the zipped ones though, but when I unpacked them it did.
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 114
    Windows 7 Pro (32)
       #40

    My IE11 Google browser (fully updated) got hijacked yesterday (No Install Chrome button/slow...), and my KIS2013 (Kaspersky Internet Security) AV failed to prevent this or detect it on All scans!

    I then ran my Full on-demand scans with MBAM- Negative.

    I then ran my on-demand Emsisoft-kit, and it detected/Quarantined a High-Risk browser hijacker in the registry!

    The Emsisoft AV always has a High detection rate, but did Not play well with my Windows Security Center (Non-MS code... is Not recognized by WSC), and their Firewall was a BSOD pain!

    Other thoughts- In the past I hated the Google Chrome nag, but now I like it!
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Best AV out there?-browserhijacker.jpg  
      My Computer


 
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast

Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:41.
Find Us