 | |
| |
| 03 Jun 2010 | #1 |
| | Antivirus: Free vs. Paid Detection Avira, Microsoft Security Essentials, Kaspersky and avast! put to the test. A very interesting read...not comprehensive but informative: Antivirus: Free vs. Paid Detection - Avira, Microsoft Security Essentials, Kaspersky and avast! - Softpedia |
My System Specs | |
| 04 Jun 2010 | #2 |
| | I either use the free versions of Avast or Avira (sans nag screen  ) for my installations + common sense , I've done pretty well in remaining clean.Testing 'sus' files in a VM also helps as well. And if I ever do get infected, well I got what I paid for  |
| My System Specs |
| 04 Jun 2010 | #3 |
| | Agree with you, I use Avast free and Zone Alarm free firewall (new ver 9 for Windows 7 x64). Along with a little common sense you can be reasonably save....although I did get a virus warning on the World book encyclopedia online site a few days ago. Just goes to show you....you can't be too careful. I haven't been infected since Win 98se and that made me a wiser man. Never take your security for granted, the black hats don't. |
| My System Specs |
| . |
| |
| 04 Jun 2010 | #4 |
| | Here is a recent comparison that adds to the context:  |
| My System Specs |
| 04 Jun 2010 | #5 |
| | I'm using avira free and i'm satisfied with it so far.... |
| My System Specs |
| 04 Jun 2010 | #6 |
| | |
| My System Specs |
 |
Antivirus: Free vs. Paid Detection problems?
| Thread Tools | |
| Similar help and support threads for: Antivirus: Free vs. Paid Detection | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| AVG Adds Do Not Track Feature to Free and Paid Antivirus Software | Security News | |||
| Free vs. Fee: Free and Paid Antivirus Programs Compared | Security News | |||
| What’s worse than paid for antivirus? Free AV | Security News | |||
| Microsoft vs. McAfee: How free antivirus outperformed paid | Security News | |||
| Antivirus: Free vs. Paid Detection | System Security | |||
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:42 AM.
