New
#40
I completely understood what you said in your previous post itself. I just suggested that you include some form of that explanation in the tutorial so that others also can understand.
Well DISM can be used to capture WIM images of installations... right? And DISM is native to Windows. And would not the WIM images be much smaller in size?
As I see it, from a higher level view :
- The system image tool tries to capture a working windows installation for drop-in replacement of the OS instance at any time.
- Image capture modifies the installation image with updates and software, so that one can newly install with much more up-to-date components.
So when considering the array of options available to windows users today to rollback, the system image tool should be used to get back immediately to a known good working point, usually when the current system has failed somehow. While the custom install.wim should be used to do a fresh install, just with more updated components and some software. Perhaps DISM is better suited to add updates, while system image better for software. Perhaps DISM is better suited for a generalized always-updated OS installation DVD ISO for any system to start afresh, while system image for single system and very predictably similar HDD partition layout.
I hope I seem like I'm heading somewhere with this...?