![]() |
|
28 Nov 2011 | #1 |
![]() |
Which is Best Image or Clone
I have just begun using Macrium Reflect. I notice that there is an option to clone or to image. I have used System Image in the past, to restore to the same hard drive.
In the event that I have a hard drive failure and want to restore my OS to another hard drive, most likely larger than the original, would Image or Clone be the best option? |
My System Specs![]() |
. |
|
28 Nov 2011 | #2 |
|
|
My System Specs![]() |
28 Nov 2011 | #3 |
|
I think there is a bit of semantic debate around the two words.
For me: 1) Cloning = a true sector by sector or bit image copy from one physical device to another. You can use it when you have the final physical disk available that you want to make the bit copy to. 2) Imaging = stores intermediate files (vhd, mrimg ...) on another HDD keeping that HDDs file system in tact. The images can also be compressed saving space. You can delete the images and reuse the space. Also have multiple images for different configurations. Or, when you are ready, transfer the images to a new physical HDD. So to answer your question. If you want simplicity and are ready to to go now - cloning may be the option. Otherwise go for imaging. Personally I'd use this even if I was ready to go with a new HDD in my hand. |
My System Specs![]() |
. |
|
28 Nov 2011 | #4 |
![]() |
I would image all partitions. Then you can restore them individually on an as needed basis. Usually you only restore the C: partition because the 100MB active partion and the recovery partition never change.
In the event of a failure of the HDD or if you decide to upgrade your HDD to a larger model, you can still restore all partitions into predifined partitions - predefine e.g. with Partition Wizard bootable CD (last entry on this webpage). |
My System Specs![]() |
28 Nov 2011 | #5 |
|
One thing that throws me, is that True Image has the option to create a sector by sector image included in a regular backup image, yet has a cloning function apart from that.
|
My System Specs![]() |
28 Nov 2011 | #6 |
|
Macrium V5 also has a cloning option. It is possible that it is using imaging as an intermediate step?? But you do need and get a bootable physical 2nd HDD.
I now consider "cloning" is an umbrella term for the immediate creation of a bootable copied HDD. |
My System Specs![]() |
28 Nov 2011 | #7 |
|
I usually think of a "clone" as when i have the ability to have both the original HDD and a second HDD and I want to move one to the other. I think of an "image" more as a backup where I work with 1 hard drive and simply put it back to the way it was.
Both "terms" can be used to accomplish the same task. i don't think that 1 in inherently better than the other across the board. |
My System Specs![]() |
28 Nov 2011 | #8 |
![]() |
I usually think of a "clone" as when i have the ability to have both the original HDD and a second HDD and I want to move one to the other. I think of an "image" more as a backup where I work with 1 hard drive and simply put it back to the way it was.
Both "terms" can be used to accomplish the same task. i don't think that 1 in inherently better than the other across the board. My appreciaton extends to all, who have taken the time to answer. Rep to all. |
My System Specs![]() |
28 Nov 2011 | #9 |
|
This topic caught my eye, because I'm soon going to have to reorganize my drives and partitions, because I've about run out of space on one of my video archive drives. The drive that I intend to use for it is the one that is currently being used for the OS, and some other types of archive volumes, which means that at least the OS volume needs to be moved to another drive that I have in mind.
In the past, I would have simply used a backup image to restore everything on that drive, while all other drives are disconnected, so that no boot menu would be created (I use the BIOS boot menu instead). However when doing so, I have found that there is some minor differences in the restored volume that I would prefer to eliminate. If I understand correctly, cloning should do exactly that. The confusing part for me is that I only want to clone a partition, not the entire drive...can that be done? |
My System Specs![]() |
28 Nov 2011 | #10 |
|
Cloning I believe is an entire drive type operation.
So a partition Image may be the best way to go, if your only wanting to keep that partiiton. Overall, I too prefer the Partion or Full disk Image method over cloning. For 1 reason, its faster. And secondly, I find it much easier and simpler moving a system Image to a dis-similar drive. (either smaller or larger) In regards to sector-by-sector, I never use that option myself. But according to Acronis: Quote:
What is a sector-by-sector backup (raw image)?
The sector-by-sector backup allows you to create an image of all sectors of the selected partition. This image will contain not only sectors with data but also sectors that are free. As a result, this image will be equal in size to the disk being imaged Which is odd, because I have found restoring a image with Acronis to a smaller or larger drive, forces it into sector-by-sector restore -- with resize options, even though the original image was not created with the sector-by-sector option. |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Similar help and support threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Macrium Reflect allows me to Image but not Clone Working with an Acer Aspire Laptop, I was notified by Windows 7 that hard drive failure is imminent. Using Macrium Reflect I clicked on Image option and was able to image my disk to an external drive connected to USB, but choosing the Clone option produced message that no disk was attached.... |
Backup and Restore | |||
Win 7 Clone or Mirror Image Hey Guys, I know Win 7 can do it, BUT would I be able to restore back from a USB External drive? Im running WIN 7 on a Imac running bootcamp so I cant plug an esata drive into it.or remove the OLD drive.. .. Any help would be great! If the Windows mirror image wont restore from a USB 3.0 drive any... |
Backup and Restore | |||
Need help to determine best course of action-clone,image,win transfer I have an HP625 running Win 7 pro 64bit and it is starting to act flaky, so a new laptop is in my near future. I want to move all of my files and programs to the new system and can decide which would be the best way. I have my Win 7 pro disks so I can install it on the new laptop, since it will... |
Backup and Restore | |||
Image & clone ? Hi... I have been confused regarding size of the backup hdrive. I have a 750 system drive. I only used 1/3 of that system drive. I did a Windows backup image on a 1TB which I had 2 partitions of aprox. 480GB each. I had to do a restore only one and it was the first time that I ever restored an... |
Backup and Restore | |||
to Clone or to Image that is the ? Hello again , i read here at the Forum " Hardware requirements For any serious imaging you should have two additional physical disk drives – additional to the drive on which the OS resides. They can be 2 external disks or one external and one internal disk. An internal disk will obviously... |
Backup and Restore |
Our Sites |
Site Links |
About Us |
Find Us |
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized,
sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation.
"Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.
© Designer Media Ltd All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:53. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |