Macrium cloned drive REALLY slow

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

  1. mjf
    Posts : 5,969
    Windows 7x64 Home Premium SP1
       #21

    Lady Fitzgerald said:
    mjf said:
    Lady Fitzgerald said:

    More work and time that way. Cloning the existing HDD to the new hybrid HDD is a single operation, after which I just have to physically swap drives. With imaging, I would have to make an image of the drive to a third drive, "restore it" to the new drive—two operations—before I could do the physical swap.
    I guess you do what you are comfortable with. I have never bothered with cloning. There may be 2 operations with imaging but it is faster in the end and every image can restore your existing HDD or restore to a new HDD straight out of box.
    Actually, cloning is significantly faster, far simpler, and doesn't require a third drive (or extra space on the original drive, something that isn't always available), especially when transferring to a single drive. Transferring to multiple drives might be faster with imaging.
    I disagree totally. Cloning is a drive to drive bit copy. This is very inflexible and copies lots of unwanted rubbish (eg page file). Imaging is faster There may be 2 operations with imaging but it is faster, particulary when using USB3, esata or even an additional internal sata drive and every image can restore your existing HDD or restore to a new HDD straight out of box. It allows multiple images to be stored on a cheap external USB HDD. Typically people would still only need 2 HDDs. Their internal HDD/SSD and an external. When your internal fails stick a new one in and you are up and running.
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 9,600
    Win 7 Ultimate 64 bit
       #22

    mjf said:
    Lady Fitzgerald said:
    mjf said:
    I guess you do what you are comfortable with. I have never bothered with cloning. There may be 2 operations with imaging but it is faster in the end and every image can restore your existing HDD or restore to a new HDD straight out of box.
    Actually, cloning is significantly faster, far simpler, and doesn't require a third drive (or extra space on the original drive, something that isn't always available), especially when transferring to a single drive. Transferring to multiple drives might be faster with imaging.
    I disagree totally. Cloning is a drive to drive bit copy. This is very inflexible and copies lots of unwanted rubbish (eg page file). Imaging is faster There may be 2 operations with imaging but it is faster, particulary when using USB3, esata or even an additional internal sata drive and every image can restore your existing HDD or restore to a new HDD straight out of box. It allows multiple images to be stored on a cheap external USB HDD. Typically people would still only need 2 HDDs. Their internal HDD/SSD and an external. When your internal fails stick a new one in and you are up and running.
    Honey, I've both cloned and imaged from my notebook, and, believe me, when moving everything from one HDD to another, cloning is one heck of a lot faster. In this case, I'm getting ready to replace the HDD in my notebook with a SSHD. If I were to image the original HDD, I would have to put the image on a third drive first, then I would have to "restore" the image to the SSHD. That means more or less babysitting the process so I can initiate each step. If I just clone the HDD to the SSHD, all I have to do is start it, walk away while it does it does its thing, then I can just swap drives. Also, I don't have USB 3.0 or e-SATA on my notebook.

    Now, when making backups, imaging is faster and allows restoring data to the original drive without having to physically swap drives, especially when one is referring to the OS and program. I image my C:/ drive on my desktop so I can easily restore it if it goes pear shaped. However, I clone the one data drive I have in use so far so, if the data drive should die and need replacing, I can plug the cloned backup drive into the hot swap bay on my computer and keep chugging along until I get and install a replacement drive, then just clone the backup drive to the replacement drive. While making an image would be faster, especially if I was making incremental images, in this case, cloning is far more convenient in the long run. And I don't really care how long the clone takes to make since I just start it and walk away, skip to the loo, watch a movie, go to bed, whatever, until it's done.

    On the notebook, the only thing I will ever need to actually backup is the C:/ partition and one folder and that folder will need backing up only when I'm on the road and have photos to put in it until I get home. The C;/ partition gets imaged. It's simpler and faster to just copy files downloaded from the camera card to a backup HDD I carry with me when on the road, a 32GB camera card I keep in my purse, and to my Amazon Cloud Drive. These backups are temporary until I transfer the files to my desktop where its backups will take over. Any other files on the notebook (books, music, emergency data) are static and also on the desktop so are already backed up. If any get lost while on the road, I will also have a copy on the HDD I use for on the road backups and, push come to shove, I can download them from the Carbonite backing up my desktop.

    When I start putting videos on their own data drives, I'm not even going to bother with imaging or cloning. Since, once the video file is on the HDD, it'll never be changed, moved, etc. it will be easier and faster to just save each new file to the internal data drive and each of the backup drives.
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 24,479
    Windows 7 Ultimate X64 SP1
       #23

    see3po what is the new drive?
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 9,600
    Win 7 Ultimate 64 bit
       #24

    I cloned my notebook's HDD to the new SSHD last night. I just started the clone (using Macrium Reflect, which, btw, can be set to do an Intelligent sector clone; i.e. it only clones the sectors that have data in them), then kicked back and let it do its thing while I watched a movie. After the movie, I took the cloned drive out of the dock (USB 2.0; my notebook doesn't have e-SATA or USB 3.0) and put it in its anti-static sleeve for the night. After lunch today, I opened up my notebook, removed the original HDD and swapped in the cloned SSHD. If it hadn't been for the aluminum tape along the edge of the HDD frame holding the original HDD in place, it would've taken me only five minutes to do the job (it took another five minutes to peel away that stupid tape). The notebook booted right up. Even though the clone showed the boot partition to be a G:/ drive and the data partition (D:/ on the notebook) to be H:/, when I checked in Computer, it showed the boot partition to be C:/ (which I expected) and the data partition was showing up as D:/ again (that surprised me; I was expecting to have to manually re-letter it). All my programs worked although M$ Word had to some kind of a reinstall thing the first time I opened it up; after that, it ran just fine.

    Although it's supposed to take as many as 15 restarts before the SSHD will reach the maximum boot time improvement, after only four restarts, my two pokiest programs, calibre and Media Monkey, opened as fast as they do on my desktop, which has an actual SSD for the boot partition. I didn't feel like doing any more starts right now since I'm thrilled with how fast calibre and Media Monkey get up to speed now (pardon the pun). I need to make a fresh backup for it (image the boot partition and either image or clone the data partition; I haven't decided yet) but that will keep for now. I have a padded transport case that I modified to hold both the original HDD and the backup HDD so I can keep both in my notebook case. If the boot partition on the SSFD ever gets scrambled, I can restore it using an image from the backup HDD. If the SSHD goes belly up and cannot be revived, I can pop the original HDD back into the notebook. I also keep a second backup HDD in a drawer at home and a third one in a safe deposit box at my credit union.
      My Computer


  5. mjf
    Posts : 5,969
    Windows 7x64 Home Premium SP1
       #25

    I love being called Honey. Have I got the spelling right?
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 24,479
    Windows 7 Ultimate X64 SP1
       #26

    mjf said:
    I love being called Honey. Have I got the spelling right?
    Well, ok then, honey.
      My Computer


 
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 20:27.
Find Us