Post your Super PI 1M Times.

Akalank · 03 Apr 2012

dear essenbe,

It certainly looks that way. You get some .35 s per loop against mine of .5 s despite the 2500K being i5 3.3GHz. Obviously, something other than processor speed (i5 vs i7?, K?, OS, ...) is at play here.
May be someone can shed light on this anomaly.

Killy.

Britton30 · 03 Apr 2012

Ha! I beat all of you, longer in better, right?

Athlon64 X2 2.4GHz 2GB DDR 400

Post your Super PI 1M Times.-capture.jpg

TypeR · 03 Apr 2012

Stock i5 2320

essenbe · 03 Apr 2012

Britton30 said:

Ha! I beat all of you, longer in better, right?

Athlon64 X2 2.4GHz 2GB DDR 400

Yep. you sure did beat us all. Congratulations. Those Athlon's are hard to beat.

Akalank · 03 Apr 2012

Post your Super PI 1M Times.-sarcasm.jpg

I hope BRITTON 30 sees the sarcasm in this post. Taking 39 sec for a 8 to 12 sec job!!

essenbe · 03 Apr 2012

Akalank said:

I hope BRITTON 30 sees the sarcasm in this post. Taking 39 sec for a 8 to 12 sec job!!

I believe I can speak for Britton30 and say he knew very well that it was sarcastic. His post was sarcastic also. But, while you are doing the explaining, I just ran Super PI with a resource type gadget open on my desktop. It tells activity by core and also of the whole CPU. It also has installed, used and total usage of ram. During the test the max CPU usage was 13% and max ram usage was 21%. So what exactly was it testing?