I actually have already benchmarked it myself a couple posts before this one. I really did not see much significance to keep it.Sure :)
Here's the benchmark mate. Firefox is actually Pale Moon. I don't have one compared to Firefox itself though.
HiksIam open 10 Tabs in same Time
Here you can check my Result in here
Did you do your benchmark with 10 tabs open? I am not sure. But I think that would drastically lower your benchmark scores. I do not think I have even seen a chrome benchmark that low before. Though I have not seen them all. I am sure there is a few. But That is lower than IE9 was on my system. I do not have a very good system either.
I thought it would be interesting to fire up an old (el cheepo) e-machine and take the browser test as I update from IE7 to IE8, then Chrome. This is a T1840 e-machine using Win XP, SP3. Comes stock with a Celeron 1.8 GHz processor, 40 GB HD, 128 MB RAM, and 48 MB (whew!) of ON BOARD AGP mem. I did the tests using one of my 22" Sceptre monitors at 1600 x 900 resolution and 32 bit color just to "strain" the stock system.
The IE-7 test results are (as suspected) super lousy. I didn't bother with screen shots for a couple of reasons. Anyway, here are the numbers:
IE-7 (7.0.5730.11) tested at 107 (about the slowest I've seen on this thread)
IE-8 (8.0.6001.18702) tested at 157
Chrome (9.0.597.98) tested at 1753 WOW!
If you want a way to speed up surfing (noticeably) on an old or cheep machine, try Chrome instead of a new graphics card. It's free, and you won't even have to pull of the cover!
Quote
