Why has Firefox become so bad?

Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast

  1. Posts : 117
    Windows 7 Pro
       #1

    Why has Firefox become so bad?


    Please read this post and this post of mine before you post a reply.

    Why has Firefox become so bad?

    It's becoming more and more bloated and less like what it was intended to be (fast and functional) when it was first released to compete with IE.

    It takes up insane amounts of ram memory. It also crashes so easily whenever the flash plugin crashes.

    Compare it to another browser like Chrome and the consumption and stability differences are so vast, even though Chrome was created after Firefox.. Chrome consumes 1/5 as much memory, doesn't lag at all even when many tabs are open and doesn't crash at all even if its flash plugin crashes.

    I hate to use Chrome over Firefox but it's proving to be superior to Firefox in the most important areas of memory consumption, lag speed and stability. Chrome has major problems ensuring that downloads do not become corrupted, which is a nail to its heart.

    Firefox, please take care of the important core issues before fiddling around with issues concerning user-created plugin...
    Last edited by Ravanx; 13 Nov 2010 at 13:12.
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 3,139
    Systems 1 and 2: Windows 7 Enterprise x64, Win 8 Developer
       #2

    If I hear the word "bloated" one more time I'm gonna go postal.

    Here ya go...

    Crazy Browser
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 6,857
    Win 7 Ultimate 64-bit SP1 (desktop)
       #3

    Ravanx said:
    Why has Firefox become so bad?

    It's becoming more and more bloated and less like what it was intended to be (fast and functional) when it was first released to compete with IE.
    It's fast and functional for me.
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 195
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1
       #4

    Personally I don't think it's slow when browsing but I did notice that the latest builds of FF 3.6 got slower starting up, but I guess it's to do with your hardware more than anything.

    In my experience with Firefox 4 I think it's lost it's usability a little compared to 3.6, I wish they'd thought more about the Orange button.

    It's the UI of Firefox 4 that pushed me to another browser, I'm glad it did because after using Chrome, Firefox to me now is a speck in the dust.
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 117
    Windows 7 Pro
    Thread Starter
       #5

    G1LLY said:
    Personally I don't think it's slow when browsing but I did notice that the latest builds of FF 3.6 got slower starting up, but I guess it's to do with your hardware more than anything.

    In my experience with Firefox 4 I think it's lost it's usability a little compared to 3.6, I wish they'd thought more about the Orange button.

    It's the UI of Firefox 4 that pushed me to another browser, I'm glad it did because after using Chrome, Firefox to me now is a speck in the dust.
    My 1 year old computer runs Firefox as fast as my 6 year old computer, even though it has about 3 to 4x the specs of my old computer.
    It's not the hardware, it's firefox.
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 7,878
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64
       #6

    The true bloat usually shows up with Add-ons and such. On it's own, it's still small, lightweight and fast.
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 2,528
    Windows 7 x64 Ultimate
       #7

    What is happening is that FF is reaching the dreaded version "4.0"

    Mozilla killed Netscape with version 4.0. It was so buggy and "bloated" (at the time) that it made IE 4.0 look good and they completely lost their user base. I was a 100% loyal Netscape user utill 4.0 stabbed me in the eye.

    They seem to be doing it again with FF. They just cant get past that magic number for some reason. They need to start over again with a new browser "Water Weasel 1.0" or something and just skip 4.0 altogeather :)

    Edit: "Earth Ermine"? "Sky.. uh... Scallop"? :)
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 3,139
    Systems 1 and 2: Windows 7 Enterprise x64, Win 8 Developer
       #8

    fseal said:
    What is happening is that FF is reaching the dreaded version "4.0"

    Mozilla killed Netscape with version 4.0. It was so buggy and "bloated" (at the time) that it made IE 4.0 look good and they completely lost their user base. I was a 100% loyal Netscape user utill 4.0 stabbed me in the eye.

    They seem to be doing it again with FF. They just cant get past that magic number for some reason. They need to start over again with a new browser "Water Weasel 1.0" or something and just skip 4.0 altogeather :)
    Water Weasel for the World Wide Web: WWWWW
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 2,009
    Windows 7 Ultimate x86
       #9

    Granted, Chrome is faster (always was) but
    Have you counted your Plugins recently?
    Start Firefox with the switch -P (Profile manager) create a new profile and see if it's still slow and sluggish.

    -DG
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 826
    Windows 7 Professional 64 Bit SP1
       #10

    Firefox...is slow? I use Firefox and I find that almost all web pages load faster than a blink of an eye, even multimedia heavy one.

    Isn't Chrome the browser that opens up a new process for each tab? I prefer my single 100MB~150MB Firefox process than 10 x 150mb~ Chrome processes (just for a simple browsing session too~)

    The newer Firefox versions have a 'plugin container', so if Flash crashes in Firefox, only the Firefox plugin container crashes, not the whole Firefox.
      My Computer


 
Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 19:09.
Find Us