Why are Chrome and Firefox so SLOW to load?

I bought my old HP laptop in 2004. It has an AMD Athlon 64 3400+ CPU. It started with 1GB DDR RAM and Window XP Home. I upgraded it to 2GB DDR RAM and Windows 7 Home. It still has its original 80GB IDE/PATA hard drive.

Browsers

• Chrome: 88.0.4324.190 *
• Edge: 99.0.1150.55 *
• Firefox: 98.0.2

* Note the Athlon 64 3400+ Clawhammer supports SSE 1&2 but not SSE3. This limits updates of Chrome and Edge browsers.

Load time for browsers (1st time/2nd time) **:

• Chrome: 39/6 seconds
• Edge: 27/6 seconds
• Firefox: 68/12 seconds

** Notes:

1. Time was from start to load of Google search home page
2. Because both Edge and Chrome browsers are based on Chromium, computer was booted between tests.

Yeah.. I kinda know what duo means... It's why I brought up the subject of my parent's computer...

I made mention of the architecture...

The One and Only said:

It could very well be his CPU since he's mentioned in other threads it's only 2 GHz. But I kinda doubt that would be an issue either.

My parent's computer is around 3.5 GHz if I remember. I know I bought the fastest clock speed for that model.

It's conceivably possible a slow clock and slow hard drive could make for a slow to load browser. Without invoking safe mode in the browser like I mentioned we'll never know. But there are possible other factors that can slow the browser down. To rule that out the OP would have to install a temporally copy of 7 on another hard disk, install Firefox or use portable Firefox and see if there's a difference.

- - - Updated - - -

MisterEd said:

It still has its original 80GB IDE/PATA hard drive.

Ever see these? Amazon.com

Price is an absolute rip off since the manufacture just changes some chips and the interface. I've seen other brands...

Just so you and everyone knows if no one knows. IDE (Integrated Drive Electronics) describes both PATA and SATA. IDE has been misused and is a misnomer to PATA. IDE came about sometime late '80s if I can remember. Just means the electronics are onboard the drive versus needing a dedicated board in the computer... So because of that, I NEVER say IDE to describe PATA. I just say PATA. Or SATA, or SCSI...

I suppose most people call it that for three reasons:

1) We've been using PATA since the dawn of apes until SATA came about.

2) There's a better word to describe this, but it's physiological withen the chain of custody of "apparent knowledge" garnered throughout one's Internet travels... Same applies to all forms of the media and one's government overseers.

3) When in Rome...When in Rome, do as the Romans do - Wikipedia

F22 Simpilot said:

Just so you and everyone knows if no one knows. IDE (Integrated Drive Electronics) describes both PATA and SATA. IDE has been misused and is a misnomer to PATA. IDE came about sometime late '80s if I can remember. Just means the electronics are onboard the drive versus needing a dedicated board in the computer... So because of that, I NEVER say IDE to describe PATA. I just say PATA. Or SATA, or SCSI...
I suppose most people call it that for three reasons:
1) We've been using PATA since the dawn of apes until SATA came about.
2) There's a better word to describe this, but it's physiological withen the chain of custody of "apparent knowledge" garnered throughout one's Internet travels... Same applies to all forms of the media and one's government overseers.
3) When in Rome...When in Rome, do as the Romans do - Wikipedia

Excuse me for going off topic...

When I bought the Maxtor 80 GB IDE hard drive in November 2002 there was no ambiguity in what IDE meant. That is simply because SATA drives didn't exit yet. My motherboard had 2 SATA connectors on it but no drives were available to buy. I remember some people used IDE to SATA converters so they could plug their existing IDE drives into the SATA ports but I thought that pointless. Some of the first SATA drives in 2003 were existing IDE drives with integrated IDE to SATA bridge circuits. I also thought these pointless. It was late 2003 or 2004 before native SATA drives came out. The first native SATA drives were 150MB/s.

The more correct term Parallel ATA was used interchangeably with IDE but IDE was more commonly used. After SATA drives came out Parallel ATA was shortened to PATA.

Technically correct or not everyone I knew back then used the term IDE for their Parallel ATA drives. I never even heard the term PATA until years later when SATA drives were being discussed.
I still have a few IDE/PATA drives left that I use in my oldest computers. My stock of them is slowly failing so I will retire these old computers when I have no IDE/PATA drives left.

Now back to the topic of this thread ...

I am glad people are able to use computers that are free to them but there also something to be said of not discarding a computer when it is still of some use. The HP laptop I bought in 2004 cost $1500 so I am reluctant to discard it. I have several other much newer and faster computers so I don't need it for myself. Instead I have set it up on the dining room table for family and friends to use when they come by. For browsers it has Edge and Firefox. Nobody complains because it is much better for browsing the Internet than the phone they normally use.

yes,
very slow. FF is also getting more and more freezing up (black screen). Therefore my son asked me to move to Microsoft edge.

I have been using FF since Windows XP. It was a good browser.

Computer hardware could be an issue. but my family, especially my kids are using relatively new computer hardware (6th-8th) CPU, SSD, 16GB RAM. Win10/11. I heard their complaints often if NOT daily recently. They have moved to edge. i.e. new computer hardware can see similar issue too.