New build, Microsoft-Windows-Kernel-Power Error: 0x8000000000000002

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

  1. Posts : 16
    Window 7 64bit Professional SP1
    Thread Starter
       #11

    After doing some MORE searching, ASUS only has the 1.0.0.1045 driver (29 Dec 2010 updated) for Marvell on their site for my motherboard, yet on Stations-Drivers site, they 1.2.0.1019 (06 Mar 2012 update), but it is in French. I have no clue what is the latest driver at this point and what is safe to use.
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 11,269
    Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bit
       #12

    If you start a thread in Drivers - Windows 7 Forums, the experts there will probably be able to advise you on where to find up to date drivers for the Marvell 91xx series.
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 16
    Window 7 64bit Professional SP1
    Thread Starter
       #13

    Two more BSODs in the last 2 days
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 11,269
    Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bit
       #14

    Code:
    Loading Dump File [D:\Kingston\BSODDmpFiles\wbsimpson11\Windows_NT6_BSOD_jcgriff2\032812-8860-01.dmp]
    Mini Kernel Dump File: Only registers and stack trace are available
    
    Symbol search path is: SRV*C:\SymCache*http://msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbols
    Executable search path is: 
    Windows 7 Kernel Version 7601 (Service Pack 1) MP (8 procs) Free x64
    Product: WinNt, suite: TerminalServer SingleUserTS
    Built by: 7601.17640.amd64fre.win7sp1_gdr.110622-1506
    Machine Name:
    Kernel base = 0xfffff800`0360c000 PsLoadedModuleList = 0xfffff800`03851670
    Debug session time: Wed Mar 28 19:51:16.638 2012 (UTC - 6:00)
    System Uptime: 0 days 2:00:21.402
    Loading Kernel Symbols
    ...............................................................
    ................................................................
    ................................................................
    ...
    Loading User Symbols
    Loading unloaded module list
    ....
    *******************************************************************************
    *                                                                             *
    *                        Bugcheck Analysis                                    *
    *                                                                             *
    *******************************************************************************
    
    Use !analyze -v to get detailed debugging information.
    
    BugCheck A, {fffff8a001bbde48, 2, 0, fffff8000367df4b}
    
    Probably caused by : ntkrnlmp.exe ( nt!ExpScanGeneralLookasideList+a0 )
    
    Followup: MachineOwner
    ---------
    
    4: kd> !analyze -v
    *******************************************************************************
    *                                                                             *
    *                        Bugcheck Analysis                                    *
    *                                                                             *
    *******************************************************************************
    
    IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL (a)
    An attempt was made to access a pageable (or completely invalid) address at an
    interrupt request level (IRQL) that is too high.  This is usually
    caused by drivers using improper addresses.
    If a kernel debugger is available get the stack backtrace.
    Arguments:
    Arg1: fffff8a001bbde48, memory referenced
    Arg2: 0000000000000002, IRQL
    Arg3: 0000000000000000, bitfield :
    	bit 0 : value 0 = read operation, 1 = write operation
    	bit 3 : value 0 = not an execute operation, 1 = execute operation (only on chips which support this level of status)
    Arg4: fffff8000367df4b, address which referenced memory
    
    Debugging Details:
    ------------------
    
    
    READ_ADDRESS: GetPointerFromAddress: unable to read from fffff800038bb100
     fffff8a001bbde48 
    
    CURRENT_IRQL:  2
    
    FAULTING_IP: 
    nt!ExpScanGeneralLookasideList+a0
    fffff800`0367df4b 418b40d8        mov     eax,dword ptr [r8-28h]
    
    CUSTOMER_CRASH_COUNT:  1
    
    DEFAULT_BUCKET_ID:  VISTA_DRIVER_FAULT
    
    BUGCHECK_STR:  0xA
    
    PROCESS_NAME:  System
    
    TRAP_FRAME:  fffff880039e7870 -- (.trap 0xfffff880039e7870)
    NOTE: The trap frame does not contain all registers.
    Some register values may be zeroed or incorrect.
    rax=0000000000000000 rbx=0000000000000000 rcx=0000000000000000
    rdx=0000000000000000 rsi=0000000000000000 rdi=0000000000000000
    rip=fffff8000367df4b rsp=fffff880039e7a00 rbp=0000000000000001
     r8=fffff8a001bbde70  r9=0000000000000004 r10=0000000000000000
    r11=0000000000000100 r12=0000000000000000 r13=0000000000000000
    r14=0000000000000000 r15=0000000000000000
    iopl=0         nv up ei pl nz na pe nc
    nt!ExpScanGeneralLookasideList+0xa0:
    fffff800`0367df4b 418b40d8        mov     eax,dword ptr [r8-28h] ds:7a60:fffff8a0`01bbde48=????????
    Resetting default scope
    
    LAST_CONTROL_TRANSFER:  from fffff800036881e9 to fffff80003688c40
    
    STACK_TEXT:  
    fffff880`039e7728 fffff800`036881e9 : 00000000`0000000a fffff8a0`01bbde48 00000000`00000002 00000000`00000000 : nt!KeBugCheckEx
    fffff880`039e7730 fffff800`03686e60 : 00000000`00000021 00000000`00000001 fffff6fb`80008438 fffff800`03829400 : nt!KiBugCheckDispatch+0x69
    fffff880`039e7870 fffff800`0367df4b : 00000000`00000000 fffff800`038bbc40 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000006 : nt!KiPageFault+0x260
    fffff880`039e7a00 fffff800`03673780 : 00000000`00000001 00000000`00000008 00000000`00000001 fffff800`038bbc40 : nt!ExpScanGeneralLookasideList+0xa0
    fffff880`039e7a60 fffff800`03673cce : 00000000`00000008 fffff880`039e7ad0 00000000`00000001 fffffa80`00000000 : nt!ExAdjustLookasideDepth+0x40
    fffff880`039e7a90 fffff800`03923fee : fffffa80`0ca76b60 00000000`00000080 fffffa80`0c9ee9e0 00000000`00000001 : nt!KeBalanceSetManager+0x1be
    fffff880`039e7c00 fffff800`0367a5e6 : fffff880`009b3180 fffffa80`0ca76b60 fffff880`009be0c0 00000000`00000000 : nt!PspSystemThreadStartup+0x5a
    fffff880`039e7c40 00000000`00000000 : fffff880`039e8000 fffff880`039e2000 fffff880`039e75c0 00000000`00000000 : nt!KxStartSystemThread+0x16
    
    
    STACK_COMMAND:  kb
    
    FOLLOWUP_IP: 
    nt!ExpScanGeneralLookasideList+a0
    fffff800`0367df4b 418b40d8        mov     eax,dword ptr [r8-28h]
    
    SYMBOL_STACK_INDEX:  3
    
    SYMBOL_NAME:  nt!ExpScanGeneralLookasideList+a0
    
    FOLLOWUP_NAME:  MachineOwner
    
    MODULE_NAME: nt
    
    IMAGE_NAME:  ntkrnlmp.exe
    
    DEBUG_FLR_IMAGE_TIMESTAMP:  4e02aaa3
    
    FAILURE_BUCKET_ID:  X64_0xA_nt!ExpScanGeneralLookasideList+a0
    
    BUCKET_ID:  X64_0xA_nt!ExpScanGeneralLookasideList+a0
    
    Followup: MachineOwner
    ---------
    Both the same, both pointing to a hardware problem... I would recommend installing Windows to a hard disk drive instead of solid state drive and see if your system is more stable. This will determine if the SSD is compatible with your system or if there is an underlying problem that is being masked by the SSD being in the system.

    Also, what did you mean when you said you ran Memtest? Did you run Memtest, Memtest86+, or the Windows Memory Diagnostic tool?
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 16
    Window 7 64bit Professional SP1
    Thread Starter
       #15

    Memtest86+ for several hours and everything came out fine
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 11,269
    Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bit
       #16

    How many passes did Memtest86+ run?
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 16
    Window 7 64bit Professional SP1
    Thread Starter
       #17

    I am not 100% sure on that. It ran for 5-6 hours throughout the day
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 11,269
    Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bit
       #18

    It needs to run for at least 7+ passes. Do that, then consider replacing the SSD with an HDD to test whether it is an SSD incompatibility or faulty drive.
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 16
    Window 7 64bit Professional SP1
    Thread Starter
       #19

    Ok, will do. Really hate having to reinstall everything again
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 11,269
    Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bit
       #20

    Believe me, I feel your pain. I had to do a clean install of my system twice in the last three days. I am still getting my programs back on the system a second time right now.

    Let us know when you've had a chance to swap the SSD for an HDD and test.
      My Computer


 
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:02.
Find Us