<off topic> Redirect </off>

Zidane24 · 14 Aug 2009

z3r010 said:

Kari

Erm, I had it set to 15 not 10

I've now lowered it to 10 (where it should be)

I thought so...but I didn't report it due to me thinking it was just a perception problem on my behalf

Glad you cleared that up John

Chris

Kari · 14 Aug 2009

z3r010 said:

Kari

Erm, I had it set to 15 not 10

I've now lowered it to 10 (where it should be)

Thanks. I really got valuable help and was feeling bad because I couldn't thank.

Kari

chuckr · 14 Aug 2009

z3r010 said:

Kari

Erm, I had it set to 15 not 10

I've now lowered it to 10 (where it should be)

Thanks John.

Good to see these "glitches" fixed, one by one, until things work right.

And thanks to Kari, for having the whatchamacallits, to post the observed problem...

Kari,
Can you put him on the cp list now, to confirm?

Kari · 14 Aug 2009

ChuckR said:

Kari, Can you put him on the cp list now, to confirm?

Ken got my modest rep points a minute after I read John had fixed this.

Kari

zigzag3143 · 14 Aug 2009

Kari said:

Ken got my modest rep points a minute after I read John had fixed this.

Kari

Kari

thanks and not so modest. That one didnt bite me, wonder why?

Ken

Kari · 14 Aug 2009

Antman said:

I find myself searching for quasi-worthy posts to apply rep to in an effort to spread the love - just to enable the ability to apply rep for more deserving posts.

Have to remember this. Until now I have given rep only about 20 times. This time when I really got a lot of help and couldn't thank for it, I really noticed I have to "loosen" my criteria, just to be sure I can rep when I really want to, even if the person would help me twice in a short period of time.

Kari

zigzag3143 · 14 Aug 2009

Antman said:

I find myself searching for quasi-worthy posts to apply rep to in an effort to spread the love - just to enable the ability to apply rep for more deserving posts.

I agree with Antman, its hard to have to give a boat load of points to a marginal post just so you can give it to the really deserving ppl.

Ken

holo88 · 14 Aug 2009

<-- did i get promoted? or un-promoted?

*quick checks OP*

YAY!

DJG · 14 Aug 2009

Kari said:

I've been wondering this same thing since early 2007 when we installed Vista on all office rigs. And more now since my laptop got 7 RC. No problems, no worries. Rigs working well, doing precisely what I want them to do.

It's a bit strange to read and here how much problems some have. Sometimes I can understand where the problem is; when desire wins over knowledge and you have two GPU's, blinking neonlights, 5 HD's and a couple of DVD's powered with a 450 watts PSU.

Oh s***! 4:30AM already.

See you tomorrow, Kari

Make that 3 ...

The only problems I have had came from exploring the far reaches of overclocking, which were cured by backing off a bit

.

I have from 10 to 13 HDs active, a Blu-ray drive, 6-12GB mem, a PCI-E RAID controller, a 1GB PCI-E Grahics card, a gaggle of USB devices, a gazillion stealth fans, a couple of blinking lights and no problems. I also have a 1100W PSU :).

Kari · 14 Aug 2009

<off topic> Redirect </off>

After spending last night in a strange B&B in the middle of nowhere, I am happy to be home surfing SF. Had forgotten to take some dictionaries with me, it was so frustrating because I could not understand Antmans posts. Back in my study, dictionaries around me I can understand (almost) all of them.

<off topic> Redirect </off>

If you guys have an extra minute, please check this and tell if you can give some advice.

Kari