New
#71
Just checked...he hasn't been on in a week though
Ahh yes, an interesting thread.... lots of fish commenting on the state of the pond..... blub, blub... blub.....
Where did I put my tin-foil hat? It was here just a minute ago before I switched on my new black hole garbage disposal.....ooops....
You know there were some in the Manhattan Project that speculated a nuclear explosion might ignite the atmosphere...fortunately they were better theorists than mathematicians.
The black hole researchers (the ones that will appear on Nova) claim the black holes they are trying to create are very small and do not exist for very long.
Hmmmm.... yeah ..... and fission weapons (bad enough) spawned fusion weapons.... potential "planet crackers", a euphemism in actual use. The difficult problem with blowing a planet up though is that, unless escape velocity is achieved, its mass will simply collapse back on its center.
Night, night... sweet dreams!
You are all thinking too much. We are here to love. 11:11, that is all.
i studied it somewhat in my psychology course (just his concept nothing too deep though)...
yes i would interesting....
what be surprising would be a naked singularity...
in theory that would cause disruptions on a massive scale (if the theory is true) and would change the world as we know it...
yep you need huge amounts of energy to create something that we should be scare about (even our sun is not enough to create a black hole)...
Last edited by darkassain; 21 Aug 2009 at 05:04. Reason: editing
That is incorrect. In its non-blackhole form, the sun exerts outward pressure through the expulsion of matter. In a blackhole form, the expulsion ceases. Rate of decay will increase in the absence of an opposing momentum.
This oversimplification assumes spherical expulsion in current form and polar jet expulsion in blackhole form.
The super-collider did not fail when it was fired up. It was sabotaged. From the future.