New
#51
Well the 4000 model of the L-Series was on display, we did have the TV I originally planned to get in 1080p the S-Series (5100) model but it was a 40 inch display model and I started noticing the defects I read about in reviews like the corner of the screen being dull and darker. The 4000 looked outstanding though, but I getting the updated model which looks kinda dull on the aethestic department. The (L-Series) 5000 model was still back in the stock room on shelves, we have 6 currently. I'm glad I work at Wal-Mart, I get to see what we have and don't, sure beats worrying about availability
TV Orignally planned to get: (KDL-32S5100) 1080p http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/...52921665746334
TV on display currently: (KDL-32L4000) 720p http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/...:dg_tv_gglsrch
TV definitely getting: (KDL-32L5000) 720p http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/...52921665746294
I AM confused about one thing, the TV's native resolution is 720p, but Sony says if I use a HDMI cable for PlayStation 3 or BluRay player, I get uncompressed 1080/60hz picture. What gives? Does it mean I'll get 1080p only on HDMI?
I'm thinking that Sony mean that HDMI has the capabilities of 1080p and not that you will be recieving 1080p. If your display is 720p then it will only display 720p, I think it will be a scaled down 1080p
Why differentiate the 2???? It's because the manufacturers were able to come out with new products and people bought into the hype and decided to upgrade their existing sets. And people walked into a store and wanted to ensure that they would be more "future proof", so they spent the extra and got the 1080p for good measure.
What it boils down to is the source itself. Meaning that obviously a 1080p bluray disc itself contains more data and thus presents a far superior picture over a DVD. If you take this outstanding picture quality source (blu ray disk) and play it back on a 1080p display that is properly calibrated or a 720p display which is properly calibrated, the human eye doesn't really have the ability to discern the difference between the two from any reasonable viewing difference. Thus, they end up looking the same.
Now, the opposite isn't true with lower source materials. A standard DVD for example is 480 lines of resolution...so when played back on a 720p display it has to upconvert a fair amount and when upconverting to 1080p it has to upconvert quite a bit. Therefore, if you watch lower quality source material more often, there is an actual advantage to having 720p over 1080p...because there are simply fewer lines to have to upconvert into and generally speaking the results are better.
So, I classify the 1080p "True HD" or "Full-HD" malarky as a bunch of bologna when it comes down to the television display itself. It's the quality of the components within the television that make the most difference and not simply that resolution. For this reason, I choose and still would choose a higher end 720p display over a lower end 1080p display because I am getting more quality for the same amount of money, rather than a higher specification which doesn't amount to something that the human eye can perceive.
So, I hope that's clear. It's the source material that matters...not the # of lines of resolution in the display.
For the reasons states above, the 720p is nothing to be sad about. I just recently upgraded my living room TV to a Panasonic Plasma and went for a 720p on purpose. It looks the same for less money. Therefore, I spent the saved money on the 1080p on something else.
Alex I hope you didn't get an HDMI cord from walmart....any generic one works for the PS3 or 360. My HDMI cord was 99 cent plus $1 shipping from Hong Kong....have had it for two years now
Walmart ones are OUTRAGEOUS