New
#1651
Some other Great news to bump the thread here with! For those who plan to keep on vaping as well as keeping the life saving alternative options alive some law makers are rethinking things especially being an election year perhaps?!
American Vaping Association blog pageCongress Moves to Protect the Vapor Industry from the FDA’s Deeming Ban
Contact: Gregory Conley
Tel:[IMG]resource://skype_ff_extension-at-jetpack/skype_ff_extension/data/call_skype_logo.png[/IMG]609-947-8059
Email: gconley@vaping.info
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE6/19/2015 at 8:30 am EST.…Congress Moves to Protect the Vapor Industry from the FDA’s Deeming Ban.
Spending bill would not stop regulations, but would stop unprecedented product bans
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, the American Vaping Association, a leading advocate for the benefits of vapor products such as electronic cigarettes, praised the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Related Agencies for its approval of a spending bill that would prevent the FDA from regulating the vast majority of vapor products out of existence.
If enacted, the bill would make clear that the FDA Center for Tobacco products cannot require vapor products already on the market to go through a lengthy and potentially multimillion dollar Premarket Tobacco Review application process. This bill would not impact the FDA’s ability to regulate these products, including setting rigorous product and manufacturing standards.
Since the FDA regulation was proposed last April, industry and public health advocates have warned that the FDA’s insistence on retroactively applying the Premarket Tobacco Review requirements to already existing products would lead to over 99% of vapor products being banned. This would happen for no reason other than the inability of nearly all product manufacturers — other than those associated with large tobacco companies — to bear the associated costs.
In November, House leadership signaled that Congress could act on this issue if the FDA failed to do so. Speaker Rep. John Boehner, Majority Leader Rep. Kevin McCarthy, and House Energy & Commerce Committee Chairman Rep. Fred Upton sent a joint letter to the Secretary of Health & Human Services requesting that this change be implemented in the regulation.
Gregory Conley, President of the American Vaping Association, issued the following statement:
“Without action by Congress, the FDA’s proposed regulations threaten to ban 99%-plus of vapor products currently available on the market. This would be a disaster not only for thousands of small businesses, but also public health.
“This proposal does not remove the FDA’s ability to regulate vapor products. The FDA will retain the authority to immediately move forward with science-based product standards, disclosure requirements, and many other measures. Anyone who claims that this bill would somehow render the FDA toothless is either not familiar with the law or not being forthright.
“We are thrilled to see movement on this issue. Clear evidence is emerging from around the world that vapor products are helping smokers quit. It is unconscionable to effectively ban the sale of tens of thousands of vapor products while leaving combustible cigarettes freely available.”
You can learn more about AVA and vaping by visiting the AVA website. You can also find us on Facebook and Twitter.
####
About the American Vaping Association:
The American Vaping Association is a nonprofit organization that advocates for small- and medium-sized businesses in the rapidly growing vaping and electronic cigarette industry. We are dedicated to educating the public and government officials about financial and public health benefits offered by vapor products, which are battery-powered devices that heat a liquid nicotine or nicotine-free solution and create an inhalable vapor
adding further:
Ex “Winston Man” exposes corrupt science behind WHO’s ban on e-cigarettes…
But this one is the best! Here you will see a side by side comparison where a smoking machine compares vapor to smoke showing who inhales what?!
And in addition to those articles in review of the vaping related reports seen in 2015 one of the best and also most informative articles turns out to one from the Forbes site but by a contributing author regarding nicotine itself also found in tomatoes and eggplant not just tobacco.
Difference of ecig vapor to cigarette smoke. A simple experiment
Published on Jun 9, 2015
View the difference between a traditional cigarette and an electronic cigarette (vapor product), as it is captured on video with a very simple experiment. The result will amaze you
see full reportJun 19, 2015 @ 08:00 AM 23,722 views
Nicotine Itself Isn't The Real Villain
Sally Satel ,
Contributor
I write about issues at the intersection of medicine and culture.
The man in charge of tobacco regulation at the Food and Drug Administration says we “need a national debate on nicotine.” Good idea. But first we need to understand what nicotine is – and what it isn’t.
It isn’t the stuff that can cause serious illness and death from cancer, lung, and heart disease. Those culprits are the tar and toxic gases that are released from burning tobacco when you smoke.
Nicotine is a chemical that is dangerous not because it causes cancer but because it can addict you to cigarettes. As Michael Russell, the father of tobacco harm reduction theory and the developer of nicotine gum, put it in 1976: “People smoke for nicotine but they die from the tar.”
Mitchell Zeller, director of the Center of Tobacco Products, a division of the FDA, made his comments about nicotine in an interview with New York Times columnist Joe Nocera on the eve of his agency’s recommendations for regulating electronic cigarettes.
The nature of e-cigarettes is that, like Russell’s gum, they contain nicotine and thus satisfy the cravings of smokers, but vaping – as puffing on an e-cigarette is called – doesn’t burn tobacco and release those carcinogens. Unfortunately, many Americans don’t understand that nicotine itself isn’t the villain.
Last edited by Night Hawk; 27 Jan 2016 at 23:26. Reason: additional information-Youtube clip Plus one more article