New
#11
photoshop...
I don't think so. Showing fake iPhone and telling it MAY be next iPhone and faking letter and telling it IS official letter from Apple is different things.
Gawker Media which own Gizmodo (online gadget and technology blog who got hands on this iPhone) isn't little silly company. It is considered as one of the most successful blog orientated companies.
And I bet they do know about all the legal stuff which will come to them if they will fake official Apple letter and claim as real.
But this dosen't mean that everything is crystal clear here. In some way I tend to agree with all those conspiracy theories, that it was clear marketing move by:
a) Apple, Gray Powell (guy who lost it),
b) Apple, Gray Powell (guy who lost it), Guy who found it and been ordered to sell it some large tech blog...
c) Apple, Gray Powell (guy who lost it), and Gawker Media/Gizmodo.
Reason for including "Gzimodo" in option C is that in reality with this news they are doing really good profit.
They have written about 4-5 articles in this subject and last time I checked first article itself had 5,5 million views which is A LOT!
Ok, now Let's assume it wasn't PR and really happened.
Why did Apple employee had prototype iPhone with him?
Field testing....
Yes, it is...
We all have heard about Apple's own Gestapo whose job is just hunt down leaks.
It is really strange the way the phone has been lost.
So as I already have mentioned, in a way I do agree with PR strategy.
But at the same time it spoils all the surprise effect for Apple, therefore it may lead to lose of money.
Who knows... Everything is possible
BTW. Malware developers already got hold of the story:
Gray Powell, the lost iPhone and malware | Acunetix Web Application Security Blog