64 player Battlefield3 - Cpu Discussion. (Fx 6100 or x6 1045t)

I want to avoid the stutter you can get while in 30-40 player battles on 64 player battlefield 2 maps (Very CPU Dependant). I've researched every chart - youtube HD Fraps Video I can find on all the charts in the 120-150$ Range.

The Generic Answer for best chip is Amd 970. I know
But the fx 6100 seems to have a slight advantage once all the cores are maxxing out.
ESPECIALLY Once fraps is involved. Ive seen stock fx 6100 record full HD Fraps on 64 player maps. so in the end I figured (Reguardless of the details, the fx 6100 would cut it).

Then I started thinking / researching the
Amd 1045t x6.

So I'm trying to decide between the 1045t and the 6100.

The Fx 6100 is 3.3ghz
The x6 1045t is only 2.7ghz
(OC'ing asside..).

Can the 2.7ghz chip really even keep up with the 6100?
I have heard much better things about the x4 x6 series.. so I was really considering it but its not the 1100t.

Should I stick with the 6100? or keep thinking about the 1045t?

=======

My house is sometimes hot, I can light overclock. But I have never messed with Oc.
I would want to keep it very light OC.

In the end, I think the 2.7ghz loses out to the 3.3ghz of the 6100.
So Im going with the 6100 unless anyone has any great reasons why I should go with the x6.
Which I do hear people like much more than the FX series in general.



I do not see how the 2.7ghz has any chance at keeping up with the 3.3.
especially under heavy multiplayer.

I think the stuttering problem might just be fixable, as in this thread:

Windows 7 Micro stutter Fix - Core Parking - techPowerUp! Forums

So I guess it doesn't matter what proc you get

ty. I dont have bf3 yet. Im not saying its actually a problem, I just hate those little jitters that some games get once the CPU is being taxed.

But im saving that link in case I ever need it ^ ^