What will be the limit?

A game played on a 4k resolution monitor.

kbrady1979 said:

A game played on a 4k resolution monitor.

That would be the monitor being bottleneck with the game. I doubt the game would run without huge black borders on a 4k monitor

OK, a game with 4k resolution options.

chris1neji said:

To be honest I feel like todays card aren't all that powerful. I mean the Titan is meant for people with multi monitor we are talking 3 monitors running in a combined resolution of 5760 x 1200 at high settings a titan has a hard time maintaining FPS in the 30 - 40 fps range.

Results: Battlefield 3 : Benchmarking GeForce GTX Titan 6 GB: Fast, Quiet, Consistent

A single one of those bad boys can't even run Far Cry 3 at more than 30FPS.

Gamers are still waiting for smarter AI, being able to load more players or characters, high quality sound. The devil is in the details, I want to see great facial features and details but it has to be applied to everything. This is just looking at pure raw details, you can bet your ass that in the future games will go beyond just details which will require even more processing power. That is of course if we do not destroy ourselves, we have a long way to go as far as technology, science, medicine.

I agree with that but will add this: I would rather have a game that looks good but is an absolute blast to play, than a game with jaw-dropping graphics that is fun for 10 minutes. Sorry to say, that is where most games are today. Game developers lean too much on beauty, and content sometimes gets pushed to the back burner.

Unfortunately, blockbuster games are hit or miss anymore.

True. A bit more "on topic", a game made and coded correctly, could have the most stunning graphics, physics and sound effects and not tax the hardware we had a few years ago. As it is, the games that are put out are poorly coded and inefficient.........and most are dumbed down because they are crappy console ports.