Can i play Assassin's Creed 2 on a Dual Core 1.65ghz with 4ghz memory?

I would like to know before doing something on my Laptop, I would like to play Assassin's Creed 2 which has the minimum requirements below...

Minimum:
OS: Windows XP (32-64 bits) /Windows Vista(32-64 bits)/Windows 7 (32-64 bits)
Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo 1.8 GHZ or AMD Athlon X2 64 2.4GHZ
Memory: 1.5 GB Windows XP / 2 GB Windows Vista - Windows 7
Graphics: 256 MB DirectX 9.0ΓÇôcompliant card with Shader Model 3.0 or higher (see supported list)
DirectX: DirectX 9.0
Hard Drive: 8 GB free space
Sound: DirectX 9.0 ΓÇôcompliant sound card

And also, i would like to add Dragon Age Origins...minimum requirements below...
PC System Requirements:
Minimum:
OS: Windows XP (SP3) or Windows Vista (SP2) or Windows 7 (SP1)
Processor: Intel Core 2 Single 1.6 Ghz Processor (or equivalent) or AMD 64 2.0 GHz Processor (or equivalent)
Memory: 1GB (1.5 GB Vista and Windows 7)
Graphics: ATI Radeon X850 256MB or NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT 128MB or greater (Windows Vista: Radeon X1550 256 MB or NVidia GeForce 7600GT 256MB)
Hard Drive: 24 GB HD space


Which of these games can run on my laptop?, even on lower settings? here is my system specs...

OS win7 64bit
AMD radeon HD 6320 graphics
AMD E-450 APU with Radeon(tm)HD Graphics 1.65 ghz Dual Core
4ghz memory
DirextX 11
200HDD

Unfortunately your laptop is simply not a games machine.

Both the CPU and GPU are very weak.

You might me able to play DA:O - with low details and heavy combat will bog it down, but performance for AC2 would be horrible. Not worth it.


Also, looking at minimum specs for games is a bad way to judge. Minimum literally means enough to install and run at a few fps. That's considered running. To have a decently playable, (above 20FPS, not a permanent slide show etc) Above minimum and below max is what you need to look at.

Totally a hoax. Game boosting programs are next to useless on modern PCs. They did do some marginal good several years ago when they were first released, but thanks to the new operating systems, processing power, and available memory they've been reduced to useless cons similar to those 'Make your PC run faster' scam programs that target ignorant older computer users with a fake list of infections the PC doesn't have and charges an arm and a leg to do nothing but run a registry cleaner and a one time virus/malware sweep while installing buttloads of Adware and browser hijacking toolbars on your PC at the same time.

Put simply, it's a waste of time and more often than not such programs will actually slow your games down and at the very least will not make them run any better. You're better off just opening your Task Manager and shutting down a few processes before booting up a game. That's all game boosters do anyway and they keep running in the background negating any good they might have done by shutting down other processes in the first place.

At best it might give you a small framerate boost [2-5 fps maybe], but it's not going to be the difference between a game running well or not. If it's going to run well, it's going to run well whether you run a gamebooster or not. If it's going to run like crap, it's going to run like crap with or without a boosting program.

Save your time and money is my advice.

No assassins creed will not run well with that processor, it had little lag issue on my old althon ii x4 640 cpu chip that I use to run which is a quad core, I had to clock it up to 3.3 (3.0 being stock) for it to run fine and not stutter. The graphics card is pretty weak too, it might run but it will lag trust me, 20fps tops maybe or less. Also laptops have limits, I tried running the first assassins creed on my friends laptop with low specs but it lagged and would get like 14fps or so with everything on low and look like a slideshow if we put any higher settings.