Call of Duty Advanced Warfare

oh look - it's another COD game.

Tbh, I don't give a flap what it looks like, when/where it's set blah blah.

All I care about is that is it actually different in the gameplay department for single player? If not - don't care.

COD: Non-Linear - "Real Trajectory" would make me interested.

COD: Same-shit - "Same Gameplay" does not.

AstaLaVista said:

All in all, as stated before, I am looking forward to any Shooter Game that comes up because there is a lack of them as of late, regardless of how good or bad of a port it is... more so for the Campaign Gamer like me.

Daniel, even when me and old mate whatshisname helped you put together your QX9650 rig over at Vistaforums all those years ago - you were unsatisfied with FPS games then.

In all these subsequent years, I don't think I've ever heard you say you've enjoyed a FPS single player campaign. Even if you can map a mouse button to move forward.

This latest COD aint going to be anything new either bro.

I still love the original call of duty game. it was the game that at the age of 15 made me want to seriously get into gaming pcs. shame it all had to go modern and loose the epic tank battles!!

Thank God it's not getting made by Infinity Ward!

AstaLaVista said:

boogieboy said:

Thank God it's not getting made by Infinity Ward!

Hmmm... and I like how IW made them!

Any particular reason why not? not that I care but seeing as there is nothing to talk about... why not, right?

One man army + newb tube + danger close + nuke = FU IW.

AstaLaVista said:

I get them confused because I literally pay zero attention to trailers or news unless is posted here and some people call them CoD?? whereas others call them MW?? so that always confuses me.

To be honest, I started playing MoH before I got CoD (WW2 scenes) but I was already tired of that era and the weaponry so when we got the first MW it was a breath of fresh air... and I was in love with the ergonomics of the weapons, and the run and gun was just part of it because it was expected coming from both MoH and CoD past games.

MoH MW (not Black Ops, Gawd, how terribly bad those games were IMHO) was not as good as CoD MW and not because of the storyline but because of the ergos of the weapons, there was something about it that did not let me enjoy it as much as the MWs from CoD.

Now, what particular mission are you referring to? both storylines left a bad taste in my mouth, more so because of that theme where good guys don't die and I guess I got to involve with the character

All in all, as stated before, I am looking forward to any Shooter Game that comes up because there is a lack of them as of late, regardless of how good or bad of a port it is... more so for the Campaign Gamer like me.

That Bosnian mission was in Warfighter... Didn't even get past the cinematic, I was already pissed off.
MOH was generally always more crude in gameplay from COD but the characters (like in Pacific Assault) is what made the game more interesting for me, I felt as if I was actually there. Oh, and the soundtracks kicked ass!

I still don't get how COD titles are confusing, unless you never actually played through them. It goes: COD 1, 2, 3, 4 (which is also the first MW) and after that they dropped the numbering and went forward with World at War, MW2, Black Ops, MW3, BO2, Ghosts. At least those are all the major ones (excluding expansions, handheld titles etc.)

Oh, also:

AstaLaVista said:

Well... aren't they all?

*PING*PING*PING*PING*PING*

BINGO

Gornot said:

AstaLaVista said:

I get them confused because I literally pay zero attention to trailers or news unless is posted here and some people call them CoD?? whereas others call them MW?? so that always confuses me.

To be honest, I started playing MoH before I got CoD (WW2 scenes) but I was already tired of that era and the weaponry so when we got the first MW it was a breath of fresh air... and I was in love with the ergonomics of the weapons, and the run and gun was just part of it because it was expected coming from both MoH and CoD past games.

MoH MW (not Black Ops, Gawd, how terribly bad those games were IMHO) was not as good as CoD MW and not because of the storyline but because of the ergos of the weapons, there was something about it that did not let me enjoy it as much as the MWs from CoD.

Now, what particular mission are you referring to? both storylines left a bad taste in my mouth, more so because of that theme where good guys don't die and I guess I got to involve with the character

All in all, as stated before, I am looking forward to any Shooter Game that comes up because there is a lack of them as of late, regardless of how good or bad of a port it is... more so for the Campaign Gamer like me.

That Bosnian mission was in Warfighter... Didn't even get past the cinematic, I was already pissed off.
MOH was generally always more crude in gameplay from COD but the characters (like in Pacific Assault) is what made the game more interesting for me, I felt as if I was actually there. Oh, and the soundtracks kicked ass!

I still don't get how COD titles are confusing, unless you never actually played through them. It goes: COD 1, 2, 3, 4 (which is also the first MW) and after that they dropped the numbering and went forward with World at War, MW2, Black Ops, MW3, BO2, Ghosts. At least those are all the major ones (excluding expansions, handheld titles etc.)

Oh, also:

AstaLaVista said:

Well... aren't they all?

*PING*PING*PING*PING*PING*

BINGO

Cod 4 oh how I miss the...

To me COD 4 is one of the Top 5 games in history. If you go by what technology was available to them and not simply looking at the bells and whistles of this generations games, 007 Golden Eye is #1 and a revolutionary game that changed gaming forever. Miss them both.