bad company 2 is it a clone

So i cranked up the bad cpmpany 2 beta and was amazed at how modern warefare 2 like it was,did they copy every good thing mod 2 had and just make the maps bigger,to me its a clone butpeople may disagree.

Play Battlefield for a bit, any Battlefield in the series, ~10 min. or so, then play Call of Duty, any CoD in the series. That funny sensation you feel, like you're a rat trapped in a maze, running down the same predetermined pathways over and over is called claustrophobia.

Fumz said:

Play Battlefield for a bit, any Battlefield in the series, ~10 min. or so, then play Call of Duty, any CoD in the series. That funny sensation you feel, like you're a rat trapped in a maze, running down the same predetermined pathways over and over is called claustrophobia.

lol u really hate mod 2 ,,man its a total class game,cod 4 is better tho as it has dedi,but dam man battlefield is so boring you gota agree,

It's each to their own with CoD and BF really. I've been loving the Bad Company 2 beta. I haven't bothered with MW2 as Infinity Ward have just gone off the tracks with it, CoD4 was alright, but I'll still always prefer the original CoD and it's expansion pack.

sinbin said:

Fumz said:

Play Battlefield for a bit, any Battlefield in the series, ~10 min. or so, then play Call of Duty, any CoD in the series. That funny sensation you feel, like you're a rat trapped in a maze, running down the same predetermined pathways over and over is called claustrophobia.

lol u really hate mod 2 ,,man its a total class game,cod 4 is better tho as it has dedi,but dam man battlefield is so boring you gota agree,

I dislike Modern Warfare 2 because there isn't much to like about the game. More money for a shorter single player experience than all the other CoD's and just flat out crappy online play because of IW greed and stupidity.

I liked all the previous CoD's very much; I also like all the Battlefield games (some more than others), but no matter which one I prefer, there's a noticeable distinction between the two games. Battlefield is expansive whereas Call of Duty is not. In CoD, you don't have to go very far to be out of bounds (blocked from going further), and Battlefield, you've got to go a ways away from the action to be out of bounds... which imo, makes it a more interesting game because attacks can come from anywhere.

If I don't feel like thinking and just wanna gun down fellas, well, then CoD fits the bill perfectly.

Yea w as thinking about getting arma 2 .looks great ,,But battlefield to large maps..i get bored ,,also will it be hack ridden like battlefield 2

---------- Post added at 08:48 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:46 AM ----------

cheeriokilla said:

Fumz said:

sinbin said:

lol u really hate mod 2 ,,man its a total class game,cod 4 is better tho as it has dedi,but dam man battlefield is so boring you gota agree,

I dislike Modern Warfare 2 because there isn't much to like about the game. More money for a shorter single player experience than all the other CoD's and just flat out crappy online play because of IW greed and stupidity.

I liked all the previous CoD's very much; I also like all the Battlefield games (some more than others), but no matter which one I prefer, there's a noticeable distinction between the two games. Battlefield is expansive whereas Call of Duty is not. In CoD, you don't have to go very far to be out of bounds (blocked from going further), and Battlefield, you've got to go a ways away from the action to be out of bounds... which imo, makes it a more interesting game because attacks can come from anywhere.

If I don't feel like thinking and just wanna gun down fellas, well, then CoD fits the bill perfectly.

I think cod is miles better,and bf is just copying most of there ideas and using large maps with large salle fighting,,I mean that large scale map will not run to good many peoples machines ,,as cod is made ery well and runs superb on medium rigs.
This is why i think cod wins and its user freindly and you dont need uber pc `Which means more happy players

sinbin said:

Yea w as thinking about getting arma 2 .looks great ,,But battlefield to large maps..i get bored ,,also will it be hack ridden like battlefield 2

---------- Post added at 08:48 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:46 AM ----------

I think cod is miles better,and bf is just copying most of there ideas and using large maps with large salle fighting,,I mean that large scale map will not run to good many peoples machines ,,as cod is made ery well and runs superb on medium rigs.
This is why i think cod wins and its user freindly and you dont need uber pc `Which means more happy players

I think you might have things turned around a bit? Battlefield was released before Call of Duty; more than a year before, so if anyone is doing any copying, it's not Battlefield.

You can get both of these games to run well on just about any type of rig; the minimum specs aren't that great for either game.

I almost chocked on my coffee hearing that Battlefield was, "hack ridden" coming from a CoD fan...