New
#1921
Excellent advice.
That's old history, some PC's, when migrating into XP, had luck and drivers for them from the OS itself... but the drivers are not always complete, and that's simple to figure out... for example, my Realtek soundcard has a 30+ MB driver and the ATI and nVidia are more than 120 MB big..., if you include the full drivers, the Windows DVD could get bigger, so they better include "partial" versions instead of full, it was like that since windows 98 I guess...
Is always better to update your drivers, you get improvements, stability and more functions...
Nothing, Microsoft have sorted out their OS and moved well past Vista
(ex Vista user)
The incentive would be a switch to a different OS. as many believe, if you don't take care of workers/users you'll end up having far greater problems that can't be solved with money or discounts.
1) you can just copy and type my SN, it will be easier. 2) i believe if someone or a company chooses to take on the responsibility of providing their users with driver updates then they are responsible for all the driver updates. 3) MS doesn't have to provide users with driver updates, they can simply provide an option where the user can go to all their drivers and select update drivers and have the update link to be directly towards the manufacturer of the driver/product, thus helping the user and limiting the OSs responsibility to the user (thus limiting the users complaint towards them as well, lol)
and a side note, punctuations are mostly very important. i have a slightly bad habit of using too many, but not enough would cause "the wrong em phasis on the wrong si label" (ha ha, austin power). also, i have no idea what BSOD is....
technically, they can offer all versions. for instance, win95 requires 5 things, 98 requires the same 5 things plus 2, and xp only requires 3, then these driver software should have all 3 (or atleast two since 95 and 98 has the same 5 things) versions to serve all three purposes, thus having a perfect compatibility. ofcourse this brings the issue of space, well then they can compress all three version until called upon.
1) i've known people with OSs old enough to be a bit ridiculous in this day-and-age but they've still got it. for really simple people, and i do mean really, change is not necessary for them, so it doesn't even matter if hardware developers stop developing for them in hopes they'd buy new things. 2) as far as stopping development on backwards compatibility for software, it doesn't even make sense for them to stop, if they stop developing compatibly, they're only limiting their market. 3) the thought is temporarily very complex and i have not yet solved it, but i believe, in some way, the bkwds cptblty issue only affects hardware. (Please, prove me wrong, or right)
i was responding as i read cause i didn't want to go back to check what i've read, basically keep rereading. so i'm just going to leave that there.
...i don't know, doesn't 100% comp. have to first be comp. hardware wise?
i mean, it's almost impossible to even fit something made now into something 7 years ago, so to have a driver for it would be retarded....
...man typing all this is too hard for me today, my brain isn't fully functioning...it took me almost 30 minutes to type all this....and in my non-fully functioning it seems as though i just pulled everything out of my @$$. but i assure yall, 85% would be the same had i been fully functional.
1) For me, typing what I did was actually faster. 2 and 3) How can you criticize my grammar when you write like that? I don't even understand half of what you were trying to say. As for the part I do understand, it is your responsibility, not Microsoft's, to find the third party software you need. You are one of a total of two people I have seen that is stupid enough to complain about their computer working immediately after reinstalling.
As for not knowing what BSOD is, it's called Google.
That's exactly why Microsoft includes generic drivers in a lot of instances, so they can have the user at least working. And what's even more interesting is that average Joe user may use this generic driver the whole time and not even notice a problem because its basic function works. That's why I say something is better than nothing and like the fact that Microsoft at least tries to provide some generic drivers.
As it was said here before, it could be like XP or 98 where almost nothing is recognized or only really, really old things are recognized. With Vista and 7, most hardware is recognized right off the bat and at least works. For example, my Realtek HD Audio works out of the box with Windows. Albeit, it doesn't provide me the full functionality of EQ, Karaoke and such but at least I get base functionality while I go out and get all the drivers I need. But look at it from the flipside, if MS didn't provide this functionality, people would still blame MS anyway because the way they see it, it was after the upgrade that the functionality was lost and they will believe this to be Microsoft's fault, not the manufacturer. So to Microsoft, it's quite advantageous to provide this out of the box.
You are probably the first person I've ever heard in my life complain about having out of the box functionality with Windows 7. Most people I deal with, including IT personnel love it. No more horrid driver hunting and if the manufacturer doesn't provide a full driver, at least basic functionality is there and the upgrade is not hampered nor does it require updated hardware.
A BSOD by the way is a Blue Screen of Death.