New
#41
Mine shows 102MB is this incorrect ?
Last edited by COMPUTIAC; 17 Dec 2013 at 15:07.
Assuming that 1MB == 1024KB, 102MB == 104,448KB which is still divisible by 4.
Thanks whs, but I'm still confused.
By definition any integer multiplied by 1024 will be divisible by 4 (e.g. n x 1024 = n x 256 x 4).Verification
If you want to verify the alignment (e.g. for a SSD where you are not certain whether the proper alignment was done), you use the following commands.
Diskpart
List disk
Select disk n
List partition
Now you should see a result like this.
Partition ### Type Size Offset
------------- ---------------- ------- -------
Partition 1 Primary 59 GB 1024 KB - but 64KB or any number divisible by 4 is also good
The offset (in KBs) has to be divisible by 4.
Note: Some readers and users of this tutorial got confused because the alignment numbers in a typical Windows7 installation are shown as:
1024KB for the 100MB partition
101MB for the next partition - which is most likely the C partition
They think that 101MB is not divisible by 4 and that there must be a problem. But that is not so. If you convert 101MBs into KBs (multiply by 1024), then the number is divisible by 4 and the partition is aligned.
Are you saying that the minimum offset must be 64 KB or more?
As a result, does this mean that I can't clone my OS partitions directly to a SSD (as the offset on Disk 0 is 31 KB)?I always pre-partition my HDDs (using GParted) before installing any operating systems.
Is the end result, modern formatting tools (e.g. GParted) automatically create the correct format (which they should) without any input required from the user?
Last edited by lehnerus2000; 21 Apr 2013 at 22:50.