The legacy of Windows 7 - last of a breed?

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

  1. Posts : 25,847
    Windows 10 Pro. 64/ version 1709 Windows 7 Pro/64
       #21

    I don't believe it's a change or age thing.
    Many if not most of us have went through many changes in Windows before we ended up on Windows 7. Some would just like change to be for the better not just change for the sake of change.
    For those of lesser years that were born, spanked and handed a i-phone Windows 8 is not change. A tablet is just a bigger i-phone which in many cases they feel completely comfortable with. Some of lesser years then tried a PC with Windows 7 and discovered it was different but liked it on a PC. I would bet such people still use the phone and tablet as it was designed to be used and a PC with Windows 7 as it was designed to be used. That is a good thing.
    Then their is older folks that thought having a small phone you could carry around would be nice to have. They use it as a phone and some may text. They know their phone does more things but don't care, it's a carry around phone.
    No tablets; it's just a big phone that won't fit in their pocket. Then they go home or work and use a PC with Windows 7 and know it's a PC and it does PC things the way a PC should do things. They are happy and thats a good thing.
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 54
    Windows 7 Professional x64
       #22

    Deep inside Windows Blue: 10 coolest features in Microsoft's leaked OS

    And while we're talking notable non-features, one in particular might rile diehard desktop enthusiasts. The Start button still doesn't make it in Windows Blue. It's really, truly gone, folks.
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 5,956
    Win 7 Pro x64, Win 10 Pro x64, Linux Light x86
       #23

    If Windows 7 is the last version of a standard Windows GUI/system I find it quit a sad thought
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 4,466
    Windows 10 Education 64 bit
       #24

    There may actually be something Microsoft refers to as a "Start Button" but it won't open the classic "Start Menu". At least that's the way I read it.
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 562
    Windows 7 Professional x64 SP1
       #25

    alphanumeric said:
    There may actually be something Microsoft refers to as a "Start Button" but it won't open the classic "Start Menu". At least that's the way I read it.
    And MS claims that they "listened" to customer feedback. If they really did, they would've had by default metro + charms bar completely disabled with the old start menu and start button present at least on desktop platform.
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 4,466
    Windows 10 Education 64 bit
       #26

    It's all in the interpretation. There is a big difference between a Start Button and a (Classic) Start Menu. Be careful what you ask for?
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 15
    Windows Professional 64 bit
       #27

    I like the part of theveterans reply wherein they say . . ."And Ms claim that they listened to customer feedback". Biggest joke of all time.

    Microsoft has so screwed up !
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 83
    win7 64bit Ult. using: XP Mode, in English or Espaņol, SUA, Bitlocker
    Thread Starter
       #28

    Yawrood22 said:
    ."And Ms claim that they listened to customer feedback".
    I guess different parts of MS listen better than others. For example, they are -still- supporting XP... which is pretty cool. IMO, they should continue support for XP and all popular OSs (which by definition would exclude Vista) from then on, for perpetuity.
    link: Support ends in 2014 for Windows XP and Office 2003!
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 562
    Windows 7 Professional x64 SP1
       #29

    dperecky said:
    IMO, they should continue support for XP and all popular OSs (which by definition would exclude Vista) from then on, for perpetuity.
    That would stop PC technology from improving since if XP is supported perpetually, many enterprise and budget conscious people won't even bother upgrading to the latest version, and therefore missing improvements that the newer OS have. In addition, hardware improvements would be stagnant or improve very slowly since the older OS won't be able to support the new features a new hardware would've like better multi-core multitasking and large RAM management of Windows 7 and 8.
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 4,049
    W7 Ultimate SP1, LM19.2 MATE, W10 Home 1703, W10 Pro 1703 VM, #All 64 bit
       #30

    Forced to replace?


    dperecky said:
    IMO, they should continue support for XP and all popular OSs (which by definition would exclude Vista) from then on, for perpetuity.
    XP should be "Public Domained", if MS are going to stop supporting it.

    If the law demanded "Public Domaining" of unsupported software, MS would support it forever.

    theveterans said:
    That would stop PC technology from improving since if XP is supported perpetually, many enterprise and budget conscious people won't even bother upgrading to the latest version, and therefore missing improvements that the newer OS have. In addition, hardware improvements would be stagnant or improve very slowly since the older OS won't be able to support the new features a new hardware would've like better multi-core multitasking and large RAM management of Windows 7 and 8.
    Are you suggesting that people should be forced to replace their PCs, just because MS (or others Corporations) want to make a buck?

    If the new systems are better, people will eventually start using them.

    Cars didn't become the dominant private transportation method, because the car companies went out and shot all of the horses.
      My Computer


 
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

Đ Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 15:25.
Find Us