Could use some help(regarding 32-bit or 64-bit)

My position is you go to 64-bit unless you have a reason not to.

Reasons not to:
1. System isn't capable of 64-bit. That means you have processor that will handle 64-bit. I'm assuming you do but you don't say.
2. Your critical software will run on 64-bit. For example, one of my dictionaries wouldn't run with 64-bit and when I first switched I couldn't get Pentax raw codecs for 64-bit.
3. You peripheral hardware has drivers for 64-bit. For example, my printer doesn't yet have drivers for W7 64-bit. I can make Vista64 work but it's clunky.

What massive problems with 64?

I installed 32-bit and it's working great, thanks for all the help!

Go for 64-bit. If programs don't work get new ones. 32 is obsolete.

32 is not obsolete for someone who has only 2GB RAM. I don't think it changes much if the person is going 32 or 64 unless there is more than 3GB RAM in the system, where it is better to go 64 for the ability to use all the RAM and to go faster etc.

64-bit has patchguard and support for EFI in the BIOS. It also removes all memory limits from windows processes. 32-bit should die just like xp.

Frostmourne said:

64-bit has patchguard and support for EFI in the BIOS. It also removes all memory limits from windows processes. 32-bit should die just like xp.

While I agree with you, I still stay with what I said. It does not, however, remove all the memory limits, there are limits everywhere, may them be set or not.

Blame apps not the OS. Most people install far too much junk anyway, and add the factory junk too.