Memory usage between W2K3 server and W7


  1. Posts : 5,941
    Linux CENTOS 7 / various Windows OS'es and servers
       #1

    Memory usage between W2K3 server and W7


    Hi all
    Maybe should be under performance - but this is an interesting fact I've noticed.

    Running a SERVER as a Workstation has a lot of advantages provided you do it properly and remove a lot of the typical server nags like shutdown event tracker, ALT-CTRL-DELETE to logon etc.

    However REAL RAM usage is far far better on the server than W7 - good if you are running Virtual machines. 800MB less -- enough for a decent virtual machine itself.

    Here's the available RAM on a W2K3 server and a W7-X64 machine - both with 4GB real Ram installed with graphics / audio etc on the motherboard.

    W2K3 is running for or 5 IE8 sessions, W7 just booted up with no applications running

    Surprising difference in the usage -- WK3 Server comes out quite a bit on top.

    (Not saying W7 has poor performance --far from it but for running VM's where every byte of spare RAM is precious the server looks if it has it). In principle because a machine uses a lot of RAM doesn't mean that the OS is poor or inefficient - however the caveat here is if you are running VIRTUAL MACHINES then this IS significant.

    The difference in available RAM here is the difference of being able to start another VM or not.

    And of course there is NO problem running a 64 Bit guest VM on a 32 bit host - just your max RAM is only 4GB.

    Since a lot of people only have 4GB RAM this could be of interest.

    More than 4GB then it doesn't really matter.

    enc screenshots of memory allocation

    Cheers
    jimbo
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Memory usage between W2K3 server and W7-w2k3.jpg   Memory usage between W2K3 server and W7-w7mem.jpg  
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 1,363
    Win7 pro x64
       #2

    jimbo45 said:
    Hi all
    Maybe should be under performance - but this is an interesting fact I've noticed.

    Running a SERVER as a Workstation has a lot of advantages provided you do it properly and remove a lot of the typical server nags like shutdown event tracker, ALT-CTRL-DELETE to logon etc.

    However REAL RAM usage is far far better on the server than W7 - good if you are running Virtual machines. 800MB less -- enough for a decent virtual machine itself.

    Here's the available RAM on a W2K3 server and a W7-X64 machine - both with 4GB real Ram installed with graphics / audio etc on the motherboard.

    W2K3 is running for or 5 IE8 sessions, W7 just booted up with no applications running

    Surprising difference in the usage -- WK3 Server comes out quite a bit on top.

    (Not saying W7 has poor performance --far from it but for running VM's where every byte of spare RAM is precious the server looks if it has it). In principle because a machine uses a lot of RAM doesn't mean that the OS is poor or inefficient - however the caveat here is if you are running VIRTUAL MACHINES then this IS significant.

    The difference in available RAM here is the difference of being able to start another VM or not.

    And of course there is NO problem running a 64 Bit guest VM on a 32 bit host - just your max RAM is only 4GB.

    Since a lot of people only have 4GB RAM this could be of interest.

    More than 4GB then it doesn't really matter.

    enc screenshots of memory allocation

    Cheers
    jimbo
    wonder how the win7 would look if you disabled superfetch and windows search
      My Computer


 

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 15:50.
Find Us