New
#141
Does this still have anything to do with the original thread?
Does this still have anything to do with the original thread?
Actually, you are incorrect...
Servers will come with varying drive cages... In the case of the OP, he is speaking of a Dell XPS 430, which is NOT a server, but a desktop computer. If it is similar to the XPS 720, Dell has only allotted 4 physical internal bays to put 4 3.5" drives
Of the servers I have seen, current Servers will do a minimum of 2 drive bays (1U Rack mounted units). I have seen some servers that will go up to 8 SAS 2.5" drives on a 2U based rack system and could go up to about 16 if need be. When I specified the setup for the user, he would be able to do a maximum of 4 drives.
As for no performance hit, perhaps for a desktop. However, I have seen in an exchange environment where having a RAID 5 setup with 4 SAS disks were hammered and causing serious performance hit that it was highly recommended to do a RAID 10 setup to improve disk performance on a busy machine.
Depending on how crazy someone wants to be on performance, there is differences on a RAID 5 configuration and a RAID 10 configuration, and it depends mostly on how badly you need to do disk access.
Sorry but you are incorrect.
Here is a server:
http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/us/en/sm/WF25a/15351-15351-3328412-241644-241475-3884319.html
4 SAS drives extremely good performance. I have the same server as a G7 with 8 SAS drives RAID 5 and the performance difference is negligible. I have Dell, HP and IBM many with 4 drives, many with 8, many with 16. Once you get to 16 drives performance goes way up. We have hundreds of servers.
As for Exchange that is a whole different animal. The configuration for that is complicated. RAID 6, RAID 5, and RAID 1 if you want the best performance out of it. We have been working very closely with HP and Microsoft on our new Exchange 2010 Servers. Amazing stuff.
I just happen to be at work. Just a sec……yup just talked to the HP engineer and he in is agreement RAID 5 on 4 drives will yield very good performance. Once you drop to 3 drives then everything begins to suffer.
Since neither I nor he has used RAID 5 on 4 drives in a desktop machines we cannot speak to the performance there. But in the server area he knows. 25 years with IBM and now 15 with HP.
Unfortunately it wont install Windows. Here are steps I have taken:
- Reset CMOS
- Restarted and reset time all fine
- Changed boot order to CDDVD, HD#3, RAID
- Put Windows 7 Prp 64 bit upgrade disc in drive, shut down and disconnected RAID drives
- Started up and installation loads up
- Shift F10 to Optimise the HD as per the tutorial. All went to plan and created a 100GB primary partition (small error in tutorial as syntax is create partition primary size=102400)
- Went back to installation and set it off installing.
- Then error: Windows cannot install required files. Make sure all files for installation are available and restart. Error code 0x80070001.
Any suggestions?
For clarity I am installing on a drive that has never been part of RAID and was used for backup only. I have not tounched the RAID drives except physically disconencting thme and moving them down the boot order. Also to reiterate this is an UPGRADE disc as pc was shipped with Vista 32 bit.
Where did you get Win7? Did you burn it yourself? If so, burn another DVD at 4x speed with ImgBurn.
What is the SATA controller setting now in BIOS setup?
No it's an official microsoft upgrade disc. Same one I used when upgrading from Vista.
I left the SATA controller to RAID on so maybe that is the problem?
I was assuming with only one HD attached the RAID ON = AHCI from the info I found yesterday.
What are the other choices now?
You want to try AHCI, SATA or IDE in that order.