Norton failed in the August Virus Bulletin test! Failed in Vista SP2 testing
True, and it wasn't the only one, but when you look at the results, it had only 2 "wild list" misses.
No AV suite will ever detect all the bad stuff out there.
A lot of the av suites that passed august, have failed june's test.
It is a snapshot of a moment in time.
They test a certain list with a couple of hundred thousand entries, viruses, adware, worms and trojans.
They don't test all of the bad stuff out there.
Possibly if they had chosen an other list out of the millions out there, the test might have had different results.
(especially since it missed only 2)
If you check a little further on VB Bulletin, you'll find that Symantec passed all previous tests since September 1999.
Not many can top that.
If they did the test one hour later, Symantec might have already closed the gap, who knows?
Symantec collects updates every five minutes, so most of the "wild" will be known in a short time thereafter.
Like I said before, on my server Norton found several viruses and trojans that Nod32, Kaspersky and McAfee had missed.
That doesn't say they are lesser AV's, again, no AV will ever find everything.
Based on that knowledge I chose the one that is the least intrusive and has the smallest impact on my system.
At this moment in time it's Norton 2009.
It might be Nod32 next year.
Currently trying Kaspersky. So far, NOD32 and MSE are the only AV which has full 64 bit support. When opened task manager, kaspersky processes looks like this:
avp.exe *32
Wheres, NOD32 process shows as ekrn.exe
compared to Kaspersky.
By looking at the process name, looks like NOD32 has superior 64-bit support as .
Correct me if i m wrong.
I don't feel native 64 bit support matters much.
AV's should find the bad stuff and run smooth, that's all I care about.
.