Unigine Heaven DX11 Benchmark 3.0 Released

Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast

  1. Posts : 6,349
    Windows7 Pro 64bit SP-1; Windows XP Pro 32bit
       #41

    You have to turn the Tessellation on. How else are you going to know how good that Bad Boy is?
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 6,075
    Windows 7 Professional 64 bit
       #42

    Some new scores from me, Overclocked 965/1930/2000 @ 1.085v

    One with Tess off, one Tess normal and one with maxed out settings.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Unigine Heaven DX11 Benchmark 3.0 Released-default.png   Unigine Heaven DX11 Benchmark 3.0 Released-tess-normal.png   Unigine Heaven DX11 Benchmark 3.0 Released-maxed-out.png  
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 540
    Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
       #43

    Since my pics were posted to the other thread I guess I should put them here as well..
    First- is with out Tessellation
    Second- is with Tessellation
    Third- is Maxed
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Unigine Heaven DX11 Benchmark 3.0 Released-unigine_1920x1080-full.png   Unigine Heaven DX11 Benchmark 3.0 Released-unigine_1920x1080-w-tessellation.png   Unigine Heaven DX11 Benchmark 3.0 Released-unigine_maxed.png  
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 6,075
    Windows 7 Professional 64 bit
       #44

    I have been looking at our scores over and over Jeepman, I am still baffled as to why my 2x 560ti's beat your 570s in the 1st two tests at identical settings?

    The maxed out settings is more like it and you beat me by a good amount which is to be expected.
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 7,466
    Windows 10 Home Premium 64bit sp1
       #45

    Here ya go
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Unigine Heaven DX11 Benchmark 3.0 Released-benchmark.png  
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 6,075
    Windows 7 Professional 64 bit
       #46

    Nice score Solar,

    I am now going to run it at the exact same settings you have run it at for comparison.
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 6,075
    Windows 7 Professional 64 bit
       #47

    Ok this was with a slightly milder overclock (950/1900/2000) at your settings Solar.

    Not a massive amount in it.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Unigine Heaven DX11 Benchmark 3.0 Released-1680x1050.png  
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 540
    Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
       #48

    paulpicks21 said:
    I have been looking at our scores over and over Jeepman, I am still baffled as to why my 2x 560ti's beat your 570s in the 1st two tests at identical settings?

    The maxed out settings is more like it and you beat me by a good amount which is to be expected.
    I have no idea why. It could be your overclock, I ran those a while back so I was using old drivers, I could of been running something else alongside of the benchmark or It could just be your 560's have better low-end torque.

    I run Nvidia surround, Do you?

    I'll run new ones later with the same setting and see what happens.
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 7,466
    Windows 10 Home Premium 64bit sp1
       #49

    my settings 925/1125 920/1120 from 850/1050 both gpu stock

    I found it better this way set it too high and they start getting toasty
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 6,075
    Windows 7 Professional 64 bit
       #50

    jeepmann4x4 said:
    paulpicks21 said:
    I have been looking at our scores over and over Jeepman, I am still baffled as to why my 2x 560ti's beat your 570s in the 1st two tests at identical settings?

    The maxed out settings is more like it and you beat me by a good amount which is to be expected.
    I have no idea why. It could be your overclock, I ran those a while back so I was using old drivers, I could of been running something else alongside of the benchmark or It could just be your 560's have better low-end torque.

    I run Nvidia surround, Do you?

    I'll run new ones later with the same setting and see what happens.
    Nvidia surround? Do you mean you are running 3 screens?

    I am only running 1 screen when doing the benchmarks.

    The only thing I could think of was perhaps my overclock runs great at the lower settings but once we run the maxed out settings it needs more vram and your cards have more than mine and that makes the difference?
      My Computer


 
Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:16.
Find Us