New
#41
You have to turn the Tessellation on. How else are you going to know how good that Bad Boy is?
You have to turn the Tessellation on. How else are you going to know how good that Bad Boy is?
Some new scores from me, Overclocked 965/1930/2000 @ 1.085v
One with Tess off, one Tess normal and one with maxed out settings.
Since my pics were posted to the other thread I guess I should put them here as well..
First- is with out Tessellation
Second- is with Tessellation
Third- is Maxed
I have been looking at our scores over and over Jeepman, I am still baffled as to why my 2x 560ti's beat your 570s in the 1st two tests at identical settings?
The maxed out settings is more like it and you beat me by a good amount which is to be expected.
Nice score Solar,
I am now going to run it at the exact same settings you have run it at for comparison.
Ok this was with a slightly milder overclock (950/1900/2000) at your settings Solar.
Not a massive amount in it.
I have no idea why. It could be your overclock, I ran those a while back so I was using old drivers, I could of been running something else alongside of the benchmark or It could just be your 560's have better low-end torque.
I run Nvidia surround, Do you?
I'll run new ones later with the same setting and see what happens.
my settings 925/1125 920/1120 from 850/1050 both gpu stock
I found it better this way set it too high and they start getting toasty
Nvidia surround? Do you mean you are running 3 screens?
I am only running 1 screen when doing the benchmarks.
The only thing I could think of was perhaps my overclock runs great at the lower settings but once we run the maxed out settings it needs more vram and your cards have more than mine and that makes the difference?