Replacing GMA x4500 for my sx2801-07 Windows 7, 64bit

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

  1. Posts : 14
    Windows 7 64bit
       #1

    Replacing GMA x4500 for my sx2801-07 Windows 7, 64bit


    i would like to know what kind of graphics card would be best for my sx2801-07e since its a small tower,nothing fancy really, something like a radeon 4550 or 4650 that's below 70$ and is able to run fallout 3 really well. Thanks for reading this
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 14
    Windows 7 64bit
    Thread Starter
       #2

    haha i apologize,i just really need to figure this out fast because my tower seems to b rlly thin and i want a graphics card to fallout 3 smoothly,i actually found one that interests me quite a lot,but i still need to figure out if it will fit into my computer. The graphics card i was checking out is "DIAMOND AMD ATI Radeon™ HD 4550 PCIE 512MB GDDR3 Low Profile Video Card
    Bus Type: PCI Express x16".
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 2,606
    Windows 7 Pro X64 SP1
       #3

    You may have a problem.

    There are a few kinds of low-profile PCI-E cards available for slim PCs like your Gateway, but they seem to want power supplies heftier than your 220W one.

    www.sapphiretech.com is good at listing system requirements. I don't see any low-end PCI-E cards there that recommend a PSU below 300W.
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 14
    Windows 7 64bit
    Thread Starter
       #4

    so you are saying that i wont find anything at all that will fit into my cpu...i dont rlly want any fancy stuff,i just want to play fallout 3 without lag with good graphics,i was looking at a geforce 260 gtx or a 210gtx,because i thought they would b good enough,what do you think?
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 12,364
    8 Pro x64
       #5

    tdbnasc3 said:
    i was looking at a geforce 260 gtx
    Not with that PSU


    210gtx,
    Again, no. The minimum recommended PSU requirement is 300W


    because i thought they would b good enough,what do you think?
    The 260 itself would be okay for a smoother experience, the 210 not as much but still better than the onboard.

    However as bobkn mentioned, you have a 220W PSU - basically that eliminates MANY cards, low profile or not.
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 14
    Windows 7 64bit
    Thread Starter
       #6

    can you please recommend me one that would work because i really want to play fallout 3
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 14
    Windows 7 64bit
    Thread Starter
       #7

    i found this "http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121397" one and i heard it works alright with a 220 power supply,im so desperate for it man,you have no idea =/
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 12,364
    8 Pro x64
       #8

    Mate, I know you want to play this game smoothly - but your Power Supply really is the biggest limiting factor.

    Whilst the 430 may be fine according to some, It's still a 300W+ recommendation card.

    Bluntly put - you won't find a 220W compatible card that will run FO3 smoothly. That PC is simply not designed to be a gaming machine.


    You may get away with using some of these cards for a while, but in the long term the PSU will be pushed to it's absolute limits and will fail eventually.

    Under a 'heavy load' , Realistically you'd start facing sudden shut downs as the PSU degrades with increasing intensity until after one shut down too many - the PC will simply not turn back on. That also risks the other components that might get damaged when the PSU finally fails completely.


    Low profile cards are primarily intended for HTPC use with some occasional 'light gaming'. One common factor is that they also require a PSU with more amperage/wattage. Your current PSU has neither.


    Honestly - a cheaper way of playing FO3 would be to buy a 360.
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 14
    Windows 7 64bit
    Thread Starter
       #9

    i see,well ill just get the 410 or some other thing,i know my pc will fry up but i dont really play graphics-wise heavy games all the time nor for too long,so if i dont overuse it might take longer for the computer to break down,haha its a risk worth taking xD
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 14
    Windows 7 64bit
    Thread Starter
       #10

    from what i heard ATI Radeon HD 4670 will only take about 59,60w so im willing to take the risk with it,if it turns out to shut my pc down too much,ill just take it off or something
      My Computer


 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:45.
Find Us