New
#21
well the intel one i had was prebuilt by a shop and had a asrock mainboard
I of course added things later to find out that ths shop guy used cheap parts from the jump
Thats another reason why i build my own people try to sucker you to much
This one seen here is available now if i want to grab it
looks pretty nice and has enough slots for the proper x fire
ram timmings seem good
still don't want to jump the gun
FRYS.com*|*MSI
also this is the ram i was looking at
http://www.frys.com/product/6495222?...H:MAIN_RSLT_PG
I have just been reading a German review for the new AMD Llano A8-3850 quad core 2,9 Ghz. The onboard graphic chip HD6550D works with 600Mhz and is supposed to be twice as fast as the HD Graphics 3000 that is in the new Intel processors. Unfortunately the AMD processor itself is not very interesting and only manages to match the Intel Core i5 661 3,33Mhz. coming behind the AMD Phenom 2 X4 965 3,4 Ghz
I hope the Bulldozer chips fare better :)
Well, you might be disappointed if you had an older AMD chip, and then bought a new AMD board, followed by a new AMD chip only to find out that a comparable Intel board and chip could provide better performance for about the same cost. That's why I would wait to ensure that Bulldozer is a great competitive chip. Same reason why I'm on the fence of suggesting anybody build an Intel rig right now, because it's best to wait for Bulldozer as it might be more powerful for less price.
I don't see it like that, but I know what you mean. I went from a 790X (DDR2) to a 990FXA and just the RAM upgrade alone was worth it. I'm not suggesting that everyone should go and buy a new AM3+ board but enthusiasts like us like to have the latest gear (I know I do at least) Plus, I'm expecting big things from BD and refuse the pay over $1000 for an Intel chip.