Show us your SSD performance

Page 9 of 263 FirstFirst ... 789101119109 ... LastLast

  1. Posts : 7,878
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64
       #81

    deltaiscain said:
    Hmm, could someone maybe explain these crazy numbers? I decided to run HDtune on my regular HD, a laptop drive, 200GB 7200rpm. I'm running windows 7 in a virtual machine with 2gb of ram and 2 cpu cores, and my HD speeds were about 100MB/s higher than the SSD scores
    Does anyone have any idea how this is possible? Thanks!
    It's not possible. You tested a virtual hard drive file. Obviously the HDTune app is not designed to handle that.

    Test from the host computer and see what your results are...that will be far more accurate.
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 415
    W8 Pro, W7 Ultimate, XP Pro x64, Vista x64, Ubuntu
       #82

    pparks1 said:
    deltaiscain said:
    Hmm, could someone maybe explain these crazy numbers? I decided to run HDtune on my regular HD, a laptop drive, 200GB 7200rpm. I'm running windows 7 in a virtual machine with 2gb of ram and 2 cpu cores, and my HD speeds were about 100MB/s higher than the SSD scores
    Does anyone have any idea how this is possible? Thanks!
    It's not possible. You tested a virtual hard drive file. Obviously the HDTune app is not designed to handle that.

    Test from the host computer and see what your results are...that will be far more accurate.
    Yea, I always get flaky Atto and HDTune results when trying them on a virtual system.
      My Computer


  3. whs
    Posts : 26,210
    Vista, Windows7, Mint Mate, Zorin, Windows 8
       #83

    This is my 80GB Intel

      My Computer


  4. Posts : 2,036
    Windows 7 Professional x64
    Thread Starter
       #84

    Thanks for sharing the info whs. I am glad to see some more Intels here. I can't wait to see some of the new OCZ and Patriot drives with SandForce controllers. I may buy one.

    Thanks again for sharing the data

    I wonder why the CPU usage is so high?.....
      My Computer


  5. whs
    Posts : 26,210
    Vista, Windows7, Mint Mate, Zorin, Windows 8
       #85

    nate42nd said:
    Thanks for sharing the info whs. I am glad to see some more Intels here. I can't wait to see some of the new OCZ and Patriot drives with SandForce controllers. I may buy one.

    Thanks again for sharing the data

    I wonder why the CPU usage is so high?.....

    Yeah; I was wondering about the CPU usage too. Maybe it's because I have a pretty old CPU (AMD 4800+). I have a 5600+ (that's the best my mobo can take) sitting on my desk but did not install it yet.
    I have an OCZ Vertex too. But that will go on my Dell in Germany (in May).
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 2,036
    Windows 7 Professional x64
    Thread Starter
       #86

    That CPU usage could be because of the older chip. Thanks for the info.
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 2,036
    Windows 7 Professional x64
    Thread Starter
       #87

    whs said:
    This is my 80GB Intel

    Here is what v1881 firmware did to my Patriot Torqx 128GB SSD. I don't know what the big dips are caused by. I have started seeing them in the last few tests.

    Look at my CPU usage....I don't know if yours is accurate or mine... but interesting.

    Show us your SSD performance-pat1881.png
    Last edited by nate42nd; 21 Jan 2010 at 20:31.
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 7,878
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64
       #88

    Look at my access time, my Intel 80GB is instantaneous
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 2,036
    Windows 7 Professional x64
    Thread Starter
       #89

    pparks1 said:
    Look at my access time, my Intel 80GB is instantaneous
    My goodness, we have reached "faster than light" speeds. This day will be remembered in history. lol
      My Computer


  10. whs
    Posts : 26,210
    Vista, Windows7, Mint Mate, Zorin, Windows 8
       #90

    pparks1 said:
    Look at my access time, my Intel 80GB is instantaneous

    That's interesting in several regards.

    1. Your MB/sec is practically the same as on my Intel 80GB (which is a 1.8")
    2. Your CPU usage is negative versus mine being 21.3% - I wonder whether those times are accurate (both) - how can CPU time become negative.
    3. The SSD access time is actually in Nanoseconds. But the program (probably initially being written for HDDs) cannot show Nanoseconds. Milliseconds is its smallest unit.
      My Computer


 
Page 9 of 263 FirstFirst ... 789101119109 ... LastLast

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:07.
Find Us