New
#771
oops
Last edited by sphred; 08 Oct 2010 at 10:13. Reason: upload didn't work
Sorry I'm late I had to be in town for a couple days. Back at my house in the the bush with my dog and my computers. This is the first is the first system I've built choosing and buying ( within my means ) and don't feel to bad about my choices, but the SSd after waiting and reading for months was The best investment of all, regardless of the cost. Just to blink and miss the boot is almost worth it.
WHQL intel RST drivers.
10.0.0.1046
9/13/2010
Intel Rapid Storage Technology Version 10.0.0.1046 WHQL
Download
intel drivers pour Raid/Sata/Ata/Ahci
Run as admin-installed, and OK so far.
Oh, just found this thread.
Crucial 2 x C300-64GB RAID 0 on board.
Nid, these are very good timings for the transfer rates. But is there really a big effect of a Raid setup if you use the SSDs for the OS. After all, it is the access time that counts in those cases and the data volume transferred by the OS is only minimal.
I have only single SSDs (in 3 different systems) and I am asking myself whether a Raid0 would buy me anything. I have little user data (appr. 15GBs worth) and do not move a lot of that data around.
No, it didn't really buy me much. Just want to see what a $130 SSD can do when raid. Since I RAID my HDD on the same controller so I might as well.
I do use LabVIEW at home a lot, with this read speed I am now feel like working from home often LoL.
I write to it as well but not much, at the amount of data I am writing on to these SSD probably takes me about 90 years to complete the cycle of these MLC NANDs.
With companies racing to increase capacity of their SSDs, I have seen the price on some of the smaller drives drop significantly over the past month or two. That's enough to make me think about experimenting with a pair of 64GB SSDs in RAID. If nothing else, it would be a nice capacity bump from my current 80GB SSD drive.
Nice info!