New
#1051
Thanks!
I disabled the Marvel Controller and my reboot time went from 75 seconds to 28.
-----------------EDIT-------------------------------------------------------------
I've ran the benchmarks again and well their pretty much exactly the same. :/
I'm running on a Sata 2 socket, that is because my Motherboard said that particuler socke would give me the best boot time. Would Sata 3 boost my SSD performance?
Last edited by si8mon; 31 Jan 2011 at 21:56.
Ya I got some bizarre results from HD Tune that was not consistent at all. I wrote it off thinking it was because of the RAID.
The one on the left is a single Force120 on an AMD SATAIII controller. The one on the right is 2 Force120 in RAID0 on an Intel STATAIII controller. Can’t find the benchmark with them in RAID on the AMD controller but it was all over the place…
Edit:Oooppps, missed the last page, already been answered.
Check you motherboard manual, usually some of your SATA ports will be Intel and some will be Marvell.
The most interesting is my last post, where I found this article.
Micron's ClearNAND: 25nm + ECC, Combats Increasing Error Rates
It's not just the Intel SSDs, it's all 25nm SSDs. Hope that they can find a solution.
Might just be the best thing to stay with 34nm SSDs, at least until they sort out this serious problem.
The new Intel 510, early reports are showing a very slow 20K IOPs at 4KB read and 4K IOPs at 4KB write.
I'm hoping that this is either a mistake or they are planning to release something with much better IOPs.
The current 120GB and 160GB have 35k IOPS 4k random read, 8.6k IOPS random write, You would think they would at least match this and should improve on it.
Last edited by Dave76; 01 Feb 2011 at 00:35.