Show us your SSD performance


  1. Posts : 397
    Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit
       #1061

    ^Sorry to hear that tw33k.. That must really suck.. Tough break!!
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 3,028
    Windows 7 Ultimate (x64) SP1
       #1062

    I know..sucks. I ordered another one so should be back in business early next week. I'm looking forward to March when "Bulldozer" and the C400 are released. I'll be getting all new parts (MOBO, the C400, CPU and RAM) In other words, a whole new system. Can't wait!
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 26,869
    Windows 11 Pro
       #1063

    tw33k, Sorry about the problem. I just got through RAMing the MOBO and having 'fun' putting it back together. But, if you have decided to get the new Bulldozer - you must know something about it. I've been waiting for the release to find out about it and how it compares to Sandy Bridge. Don't keep me in suspense- tell us.
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 3,028
    Windows 7 Ultimate (x64) SP1
       #1064

    Performance wise, AMD are keeping any and all info to themselves. There's been lots of speculation but most if it is just fanboy FUD (from both sides) Here's a good read: AMD's Bulldozer Microprocessors Expected to Offer 50% Higher Performance than Core i7, Phenom II Chips - X-bit labs
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 26,869
    Windows 11 Pro
       #1065

    tw33k, thanks for the link. It sounds interesting we'll see in another month.
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 3,187
    Main - Windows 7 Pro SP1 64-Bit; 2nd - Windows Server 2008 R2
       #1066

    It will be good for everyone if AMD can get back in the "top performance" race and not be just the "budget" alternative.
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 3,028
    Windows 7 Ultimate (x64) SP1
       #1067

    profdlp said:
    It will be good for everyone if AMD can get back in the "top performance" race and not be just the "budget" alternative.
    I agree. The new AM3+ socket should really challenge Intel for performance

    (a little off topic but a good discussion none-the less)
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 7,878
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64
       #1068

    Isn't Bulldozer supposed to be the server based chip...like the Opteron's? I thought they weren't intended for most consumer use...or would be cost prohibitive compared to alternatives?

    Edit:
    http://www.techradar.com/news/comput...-intel--921019

    This doc seems to indicate that Bulldozer could be 50% faster than previous AMD offerings!. It goes on to further extrapolate that a 1090T at 50% faster would be right about equivalent with the Intel 980X. And if the Bulldozer chips don't come out soon or are delayed for 6-9 months, who knows where Sandy Bridge will be.
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 26,869
    Windows 11 Pro
       #1069

    pparks1, As I understand it at least most versions of bulldozer will be for consumer use, Bobcat is supposed to be server based.
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 842
    Windows 7 Ultimate 64 - OEM Service Pack 1
       #1070

    I am using the new 1.28 Firmware on my OCZ Vertex2 and can only report good things nothing untoward has happened at all. Not sure if this is for all OCZ Drives but I thought I would upload this OCZ Toolbox for you all.

    OCZ Technology

    Steve

    Sorry was tired and forgot.
    Last edited by steve-pressman; 04 Feb 2011 at 21:30. Reason: only post a link to the page unless you have permission to direct link the download..
      My Computer


 

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 20:17.
Find Us