New
#741
Hi Daisy,
We're looking at the SSD transfer rates in MB/s, the higher the better, also access times are important, the lower the better.
Hi Daisy,
We're looking at the SSD transfer rates in MB/s, the higher the better, also access times are important, the lower the better.
The Smart read there is an error on the HDTune's part. It's fine. Mine is the same way. Some of the bench apps out can't read the Smart right on these ATM. Crystaldiskinfo supposedly does though.
Last edited by Airbot; 17 Sep 2010 at 13:47.
You should try the AS SSD Benchmark, it factures in random reads more than write, less for sequential, and the access time. Gives a weighted score.
There was some small changes on score system from 1.0 to 1.1. Score System gives lot more points for random-values than for sequentual.
It is Score=seq_write * 0.15 + seq_read * 0.1 + 4k_read * 2 + 4k_write + 4_64thrd_write + 4_64thrd_read * 1.5
I see you added the AS SSD benchmark in, looks good.
You should get a bit better performance with the Intel RST 9.6.0.1014 files for 64-bit OS driver.
I already have them installed. I've found out this is typical results for the 180GB drive. Rumor has it they have less nands than some of the other ones, like the 100GB.
Your AS SSD said msahci, so you changed it to Intel, should show some improvement.
The nands usually go up with the GBs, must be bigger.