Show us your SSD performance 2

Page 3 of 206 FirstFirst 1234513103 ... LastLast

  1. mjf
    Posts : 5,969
    Windows 7x64 Home Premium SP1
       #21

    essenbe said:
    The 4K 64 THRD are the only numbers that look way off compared to mine.
    Starting to get to me. There must be a reason.
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 26,457
    Windows 11 Pro
       #22

    That's quite good. Keep those shots for all the people who are worried about how long will an SSD last, and how fragile they are.
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 183
    Windows 10 Anniversary, Linux & still Windows 7 Professional x64
       #23

    I'm not sure how my results are, but here is what I have using my 2x120 GB Corsair SSD's in a RAID 0..

    HD Tune: Intel Raid 0 Volume Benchmark
    Transfer Rate Minimum : 426.1 MB/sec
    Transfer Rate Maximum : 536.1 MB/sec
    Transfer Rate Average : 524.0 MB/sec
    Access Time : 0.1 ms
    Burst Rate : 2481.3 MB/sec
    CPU Usage : -1.0%


    I used another one too!

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 x64 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo
    Crystal Dew World : Crystal Dew World
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    * MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]
    Sequential Read : 503.719 MB/s
    Sequential Write : 277.805 MB/s
    Random Read 512KB : 460.146 MB/s
    Random Write 512KB : 250.947 MB/s
    Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 29.997 MB/s [ 7323.6 IOPS]
    Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 18.041 MB/s [ 4404.6 IOPS]
    Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 198.989 MB/s [ 48581.3 IOPS]
    Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 274.542 MB/s [ 67026.8 IOPS]
    Test : 1000 MB [C: 34.5% (77.1/223.5 GB)] (x5)
    Date : 2012/03/03 14:30:06
    OS : Windows 7 SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64)

      My Computer


  4. whs
    Posts : 26,213
    Vista, Windows7, Mint Mate, Zorin, Windows 8
       #24

    Those numbers are pretty good for a data disk. But the 4K numbers that count for the OS are avarage.

    Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 29.997 MB/s [ 7323.6 IOPS]
    Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 18.041 MB/s [ 4404.6 IOPS]
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 183
    Windows 10 Anniversary, Linux & still Windows 7 Professional x64
       #25

    whs said:
    Those numbers are pretty good for a data disk. But the 4K numbers that count for the OS are avarage.

    Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 29.997 MB/s [ 7323.6 IOPS]
    Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 18.041 MB/s [ 4404.6 IOPS]
    How do I fix that?
      My Computer


  6. whs
    Posts : 26,213
    Vista, Windows7, Mint Mate, Zorin, Windows 8
       #26

    There is nothing to fix. It is the nature of the beast.
      My Computer


  7. mjf
    Posts : 5,969
    Windows 7x64 Home Premium SP1
       #27

    These are mine for a Crucial M4 128GB (0309 firmware)

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 x64 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo
    Crystal Dew World : Crystal Dew World
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    * MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]

    Sequential Read : 494.378 MB/s
    Sequential Write : 199.273 MB/s
    Random Read 512KB : 368.470 MB/s
    Random Write 512KB : 199.646 MB/s
    Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 26.725 MB/s [ 6524.6 IOPS]
    Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 67.085 MB/s [ 16378.2 IOPS]
    Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 196.150 MB/s [ 47888.1 IOPS]
    Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 107.755 MB/s [ 26307.4 IOPS]

    Test : 1000 MB [C: 37.2% (44.3/119.0 GB)] (x1)
    Date : 2012/03/05 6:07:04
    OS : Windows 7 Home Premium Edition SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64)
    Crucial M4 128GB (0309)

    The only significant difference is the "Random Write 4KB (QD=1)". Your result is a fair bit lower.

    I've tried a number of tweaks including using the Intel chipset drivers rather than the ms ones.
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 183
    Windows 10 Anniversary, Linux & still Windows 7 Professional x64
       #28

    mjf said:
    These are mine for a Crucial M4 128GB (0309 firmware)

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 x64 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo
    Crystal Dew World : Crystal Dew World
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    * MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]

    Sequential Read : 494.378 MB/s
    Sequential Write : 199.273 MB/s
    Random Read 512KB : 368.470 MB/s
    Random Write 512KB : 199.646 MB/s
    Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 26.725 MB/s [ 6524.6 IOPS]
    Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 67.085 MB/s [ 16378.2 IOPS]
    Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 196.150 MB/s [ 47888.1 IOPS]
    Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 107.755 MB/s [ 26307.4 IOPS]

    Test : 1000 MB [C: 37.2% (44.3/119.0 GB)] (x1)
    Date : 2012/03/05 6:07:04
    OS : Windows 7 Home Premium Edition SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64)
    Crucial M4 128GB (0309)

    The only significant difference is the "Random Write 4KB (QD=1)". Your result is a fair bit lower.

    I've tried a number of tweaks including using the Intel chipset drivers rather than the ms ones.

    How did you check your firmware version?
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 26,457
    Windows 11 Pro
       #29

    Homeuser66 said:
    mjf said:
    These are mine for a Crucial M4 128GB (0309 firmware)

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 x64 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo
    Crystal Dew World : Crystal Dew World
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    * MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]

    Sequential Read : 494.378 MB/s
    Sequential Write : 199.273 MB/s
    Random Read 512KB : 368.470 MB/s
    Random Write 512KB : 199.646 MB/s
    Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 26.725 MB/s [ 6524.6 IOPS]
    Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 67.085 MB/s [ 16378.2 IOPS]
    Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 196.150 MB/s [ 47888.1 IOPS]
    Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 107.755 MB/s [ 26307.4 IOPS]

    Test : 1000 MB [C: 37.2% (44.3/119.0 GB)] (x1)
    Date : 2012/03/05 6:07:04
    OS : Windows 7 Home Premium Edition SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64)
    Crucial M4 128GB (0309)

    The only significant difference is the "Random Write 4KB (QD=1)". Your result is a fair bit lower.

    I've tried a number of tweaks including using the Intel chipset drivers rather than the ms ones.

    How did you check your firmware version?
    To check firmware version go to device manager, expand disk drives and find the SSD. Right click and select properties, click on the 'Details" tab, in the dropdpwn box you will see the 2nd item is hardware ID, you will see my firmware version is 0309.

    Show us your SSD performance 2-z.jpg
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 4,522
    Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit
       #30

    My little 320 Series Intel looks weak in comparison to these SATA 3 SSDs ...

    Show us your SSD performance 2-1.jpg

    But, for day to day real world use, it does perform well for me.
      My Computer


 
Page 3 of 206 FirstFirst 1234513103 ... LastLast

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 19:37.
Find Us