Show us your SSD performance 2


  1. whs
    Posts : 26,210
    Vista, Windows7, Mint Mate, Zorin, Windows 8
       #971

    Here is some of the Vector data I have seen - this is not my Vector yet. The 300MB at 4K are impressive. We'll see whether that makes a difference in real life.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Show us your SSD performance 2-2013-01-28_1814.png  
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 24,479
    Windows 7 Ultimate X64 SP1
       #972

    Yes, that is quite impressive.
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 124
    Windows 7 Ultimate (x64) Service Pack 1 (build 7601)
       #973

    Here is my 512GB Samsung 840 Pro
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Show us your SSD performance 2-capture-benchmark-1_28_13.png  
      My Computer


  4. whs
    Posts : 26,210
    Vista, Windows7, Mint Mate, Zorin, Windows 8
       #974

    Britton30 said:
    whs said:
    That's an M4 on steroids. Gary, could you make an Atto run to compare to some data I have for the Vector.
    Sure, I don't know if the settings are what you have, and I don't really understand what they are/do. Seems ATTO has the speeds reversed from AS-SSD
    Those 4K nums are still pretty good. Mine is slower.
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 24,479
    Windows 7 Ultimate X64 SP1
       #975

    Well it appears THIS was a fluke.
    In the left snip I had let a Linux distro run from USB so no data was written to the SSD.
    Show us your SSD performance 2-ssd-test.png
    Last edited by Britton30; 29 Jan 2013 at 20:54.
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 7,683
    Windows 10 Pro
       #976

    Need some help...

    Hi guys, I'm having a discussion over at DP Review here: Any tips for speeding up Lightroom4 with D800 NEF's

    Anyway the OP is asking for ways to speed up Adobe Lightroom as he has it installed on an SSD drive. Automatically people have chimed in to blame the SSD drive. Decrying it has degraded over time… even though the OP never said how old or what kind of drive it was.

    Also someone brought up the wear and tear of the drive because of scratch file usage, but I find that to be a bit of a stretch. I know we’ve had that discussion as well but I think it was generally agreed that it was much to do about nothing. It "may" have had an effect on first gen drives, but that was then, this is now.

    Anyway what I was looking for but can’t find was the test or experiment showing how long an SSD drive could go before it wore out.

    Thanks.

    BTW my screen name over there is ADMint. I’ve also referenced this thread for them to view in case of questions.

    What's up Wolfgang (whs), ain't spoke to you in a while :)
      My Computer


  7. whs
    Posts : 26,210
    Vista, Windows7, Mint Mate, Zorin, Windows 8
       #977

    Hi Drew, I am here. I remember that test. Here is one I could find in my files - but that is not exactly the one you mean. Maybe someone else remembers. I know it was in the Petabyte range you had to write.
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 26,869
    Windows 11 Pro
       #978

    I think this is what you're looking for.
    SSD Write Endurance 25nm Vs 34nm - Page 56
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 7,683
    Windows 10 Pro
       #979

    essenbe said:
    I think this is what you're looking for.
    SSD Write Endurance 25nm Vs 34nm - Page 56
    Yep. Thanks
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 294
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1
       #980

    LeftC said:
    Here is my 512GB Samsung 840 Pro
    Did you run the test with C1E disabled?
      My Computer


 

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:30.
Find Us